Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21135336›Full record

ArticleArchives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine2010

Risky vs rapid growth in infancy: refining pediatric screening for childhood overweight.

Darcy E Gungor, Ian M Paul, Leann L Birch, Cynthia J Bartok

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Predicting childhood overweight status by accelerated weight gain from neonatal period to infancy.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The infancy of obesity prevention.Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darcy E GungorDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Ian M Paul
Leann L Birch
Cynthia J Bartok
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo systematically analyze growth data from infant health maintenance records to characterize infant weight gain increasing risk for childhood overweight, and to identify additional information from those records that could refine risky infant weight gain as a screening tool.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingA pediatric office in central Pennsylvania.

participantsChildren aged 6 to 8 years (n = 129) born in 2000 or later who attended health maintenance visits. MAIN EXPOSURES: Risky infant weight gain was a cutoff selected after considering its sensitivity and specificity during the interval best predicting childhood overweight risk as determined with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We identified demographic, growth pattern, and parental feeding choice differences between at-risk infants who did and did not become overweight children.

main outcome measureChildhood overweight, defined as a sex- and age-specific body mass index of the 85th percentile or higher at ages 6 to 8 years according to 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts.

resultsChildhood overweight prevalence was 24.8%. At-risk infants gained at least 8.15 kg from ages 0 to 24 months. While 31.4% of at-risk infants became overweight children, 68.6% were resilient. At-risk, resilient participants had parents with more education, had lower weight gain from ages 18 to 24 months and 0 to 24 months and a smaller area under the weight-gain curve from ages 0 to 24 months, were more often exclusively breastfed for 6 months or longer, and were introduced to solid foods later than at-risk, overweight participants.

conclusionsWhile most researchers would not recognize weight gain of 8.15 kg or more from ages 0 to 24 months as rapid growth, it was a fair screening tool for childhood overweight in our sample and had the potential to be refined using information about demographic characteristics, growth patterns, and parental feeding choices.

Indexed as

ChildChild DevelopmentCohort StudiesFemaleGrowth ChartsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMass ScreeningOverweightPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID21135336
OpenAlexW2111912707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.