Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21134975›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Electronic medical record use in pediatric primary care.

Alexander G Fiks, Evaline A Alessandrini, Christopher B Forrest, Saira Khan, A Russell Localio, Andreas Gerber

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Paper versus EHR: simplistic comparisons may not capture current reality.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander G FiksThe Pediatric Research Consortium (PeRC), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. fiks@email.chop.edu
Evaline A Alessandrini
Christopher B Forrest
Saira Khan
A Russell Localio
Andreas Gerber

Funding

Improving Otitis Media Care with EHR-based Clinical Decision Support and FeedbackR18HS017042 · AHRQ · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI FORREST, CHRISTOPHER B · 2007 to 2009
$873k
Shared Decision Making in ADHDK23HD059919 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI FIKS, ALEXANDER GABRIEL · 2009 to 2013
$631k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS017042NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD059919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize patterns of electronic medical record (EMR) use at pediatric primary care acute visits.

designDirect observational study of 529 acute visits with 27 experienced pediatric clinician users. MEASUREMENTS: For each 20 s interval and at each stage of the visit according to the Davis Observation Code, we recorded whether the physician was communicating with the family only, using the computer while communicating, or using the computer without communication. Regression models assessed the impact of clinician, patient and visit characteristics on overall visit length, time spent interacting with families, and time spent using the computer while interacting.

resultsThe mean overall visit length was 11:30 (min:sec) with 9:06 spent in the exam room. Clinicians used the EMR during 27% of exam room time and at all stages of the visit (interacting, chatting, and building rapport; history taking; formulation of the diagnosis and treatment plan; and discussing prevention) except the physical exam. Communication with the family accompanied 70% of EMR use. In regression models, computer documentation outside the exam room was associated with visits that were 11% longer (p=0.001), and female clinicians spent more time using the computer while communicating (p=0.003). LIMITATIONS: The 12 study practices shared one EMR.

conclusionsAmong pediatric clinicians with EMR experience, conversation accompanies most EMR use. Our results suggest that efforts to improve EMR usability and clinician EMR training should focus on use in the context of doctor-patient communication. Further study of the impact of documentation inside versus outside the exam room on productivity is warranted.

Indexed as

PediatricsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care Information SystemsAttitude to ComputersChildChild, PreschoolElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMulti-Institutional SystemsOffice Visits

Identifiers

PMID21134975
PMCPMC3005866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.