ArticleMolecular ecology2010
Noninvasive genome sampling in chimpanzees.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genotyping horse epithelial cells from fecal matter by isolation of polymerase chain reaction products.Croatian medical journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inevitable has happened: genomic technologies have been added to our noninvasive genetic sampling repertoire. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Perry et al. (2010) demonstrate how DNA extraction from chimpanzee faeces, followed by a series of steps to enrich for target loci, can be coupled with next-generation sequencing. These authors collected sequence and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data at more than 600 genomic loci (chromosome 21 and the X) and the complete mitochondrial DNA. By design, each locus was 'deep sequenced' to enable SNP identification. To demonstrate the reliability of their data, the work included samples from six captive chimps, which allowed for a comparison between presumably genuine SNPs obtained from blood and potentially flawed SNPs deduced from faeces. Thus, with this method, anyone with the resources, skills and ambition to do genome sequencing of wild, elusive, or protected mammals can enjoy all of the benefits of noninvasive sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21134010What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.