Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21132563›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2011

The importance of consumer perceived criticism on clinical outcomes for outpatient African Americans with schizophrenia.

Joseph Guada, Maanse Hoe, Reta Floyd, Jack Barbour, John S Brekke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph GuadaCollege of Social Work, The Ohio State University, 1947 College Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. guada.1@osu.edu
Maanse Hoe
Reta Floyd
Jack Barbour
John S Brekke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the second of two studies that tests the impact of family factors on consumer functioning. This study tests the impact of the consumer's perception of being criticized by the family (consumer perceived criticism) on the consumer's clinical functioning. It likewise, concurrently tests the impact that other family factors have on perceived criticism. The sample was ninety-three consumer-family dyads. Results showed that none of the family factors directly contributed to level of perceived criticism, but more consumer perceived criticism was significantly related to higher levels of psychiatric symptoms. The findings suggest that an important component of treatment for symptom stabilization for African American consumers involves perceptions of the family being critical toward the consumer. The finding confirms for a sample of poor outpatient African American consumers what was found in previous research with African Americans. Results are in marked contrast to what impacted consumer psychosocial functioning in the companion study, suggesting that clinical and psychosocial functioning domains are distinct, particularly for African American consumers. This should be reflected in the interventions that are developed for African American consumers and their families.

Indexed as

Family RelationsJudgmentAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanColoradoFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.