Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21131523›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Genomic diversity of Lactobacillus salivarius.

Emma J Raftis, Elisa Salvetti, Sandra Torriani, Giovanna E Felis, Paul W O'Toole

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Whole-genome analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Enhancing the antibacterial ability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
  12. Functional and Genomic Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparative Genomics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma J RaftisDepartment of Microbiology and Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, Food Science Bldg., Western Road, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Elisa Salvetti
Sandra Torriani
Giovanna E Felis
Paul W O'Toole
University College Cork · IEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strains of Lactobacillus salivarius are increasingly employed as probiotic agents for humans or animals. Despite the diversity of environmental sources from which they have been isolated, the genomic diversity of L. salivarius has been poorly characterized, and the implications of this diversity for strain selection have not been examined. To tackle this, we applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) to 33 strains derived from humans, animals, or food. The CGH, based on total genome content, including small plasmids, identified 18 major regions of genomic variation, or hot spots for variation. Three major divisions were thus identified, with only a subset of the human isolates constituting an ecologically discernible group. Omission of the small plasmids from the CGH or analysis by MLST provided broadly concordant fine divisions and separated human-derived and animal-derived strains more clearly. The two gene clusters for exopolysaccharide (EPS) biosynthesis corresponded to regions of significant genomic diversity. The CGH-based groupings of these regions did not correlate with levels of production of bound or released EPS. Furthermore, EPS production was significantly modulated by available carbohydrate. In addition to proving difficult to predict from the gene content, EPS production levels correlated inversely with production of biofilms, a trait considered desirable in probiotic commensals. L. salivarius displays a high level of genomic diversity, and while selection of L. salivarius strains for probiotic use can be informed by CGH or MLST, it also requires pragmatic experimental validation of desired phenotypic traits.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationProbioticsAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesCatsChickensComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA, BacterialFecesFemaleGenome, BacterialHumansIntestinesLactobacillusMiddle AgedMultilocus Sequence TypingDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID21131523
PMCPMC3028724
OpenAlexW2130359204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.