ArticleDNA repair2011
Requirement for NBS1 in the S phase checkpoint response to DNA methylation combined with PARP inhibition.
Article in DNA repair, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential effects of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition on DNA break repair in human cells are revealed with Epstein-Barr virus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Article
- Increased PARP-1 association with DNA in alkylation damaged, PARP-inhibited mouse fibroblasts.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2012Article
- Synthetic lethality of PARP inhibition in cancers lacking BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment of PARP-1-expressing cells with the combination of a DNA methylating agent (MMS) and the PARP inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide (4-AN) leads to an ATR/Chk1-dependent S phase checkpoint and cell death by apoptosis. Activation of ATM/Chk2 is involved in sustaining the S phase checkpoint, and double strand break (DSB) accumulation was demonstrated. NBS1, part of the MRN complex that responds to DSBs, is known to modulate ATR- and ATM-dependent checkpoint responses to UV and IR, but a role in the response to PARP inhibition has not been addressed. Here we show that the S phase checkpoint observed 4-8h after MMS+4-AN treatment was absent in cells deficient in NBS1, but was present in NBS1-complemented (i.e., functionally wild-type) cells, indicating a critical role for NBS1 in this checkpoint response. NBS1 was phosphorylated in response to MMS+4-AN treatment, and this was partially ATR- and ATM-dependent, suggesting involvement of both upstream kinases. NBS1 expression had little effect on ATR-mediated phosphorylation of Chk1 and ATM-mediated phosphorylation of Chk2 in response to MMS+4-AN. Phosphorylation of SMC1 was also observed in response to MMS+4-AN treatment. In the absence of ATM and NBS1, phosphorylation of SMC1 was weak, especially at early times after MMS+4-AN treatment. In the absence of ATR activation, reduced SMC1 phosphorylation was seen over a 24h time course. These results suggested that both ATR and ATM phosphorylate SMC1 in response to MMS+4-AN and that this phosphorylation is enhanced by phospho-NBS1. The loss of the MMS+4-AN-induced S phase checkpoint in NBS1-deficient cells may be due to a reduced cellular level of the critical downstream effector, phospho-SMC1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.