Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21130517›Full record

ArticleLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2011

Detection of EGFR mutations in plasma DNA from lung cancer patients by mass spectrometry genotyping is predictive of tumor EGFR status and response to EGFR inhibitors.

Marie Brevet, Melissa L Johnson, Christopher G Azzoli, Marc Ladanyi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Liquid biopsy for early stage lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018
    Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie BrevetDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Melissa L Johnson
Christopher G Azzoli
Marc Ladanyi
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

The Role of Focal Oncogene Amplifications in Lung CancerP01CA129243 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Sohrab P Shah · 2007 to 2026
$31.2M
Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Training Program (ICTTP)T32CA009207 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Omar Abdel-Wahab, Alexander Drilon · 1985 to 2026
$13.7M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA129243NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEGFR mutations now guide the clinical use of EGFR-targeted therapy in lung cancer. However, standard EGFR mutation analysis requires a minimum amount of tumor tissue, which may not be available in certain situations. In this study, we combined a mass spectrometry genotyping assay (Sequenom) with a mutant-enriched PCR (ME-PCR) to detect EGFR mutations in free plasma DNA from patients with lung cancer.

methodDNAs were extracted from 31 plasma samples from 31 patients and analyzed by both methods for EGFR Exon 19 deletion and EGFR L858R mutation. Results in plasma DNA samples were compared with EGFR mutation status obtained in tumor DNA (18/31 EGFR mutant). The relationship of EGFR mutation status in tumor and/or plasma samples to overall survival was assessed.

resultsThe EGFR mutation status in plasma DNA was identical to the primary tumor in 61% of patients (19/31). By mass spectrometry genotyping, the plasma samples contained mutant DNA corresponding to 5/14 EGFR Exon 19 deletions and 3/4 EGFR L858R mutations previously diagnosed in the matched tumors. Two samples were positive in plasma DNA but negative in primary tumor tissue. Results were similar for samples studied by ME-PCR. For patients treated with erlotinib, overall survival was correlated with the presence of EGFR mutation in plasma and/or tumor tissue (p=0.002), with the two patients positive only in plasma DNA showing responses and favorable outcomes.

conclusionThe detection of EGFR mutations in plasma DNA samples by mass spectrometry genotyping and ME-PCR is feasible. A positive EGFR result in plasma DNA has a high predictive value for tumor EGFR status and for favorable clinical course on EGFR-targeted therapy and could therefore be useful in guiding clinical decisions in patients with insufficient or unavailable tumor specimens.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseSequence DeletionAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellDNA, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID21130517
PMCPMC3282180
OpenAlexW2071042296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.