Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21129975›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2011

Computational databases, pathway and cheminformatics tools for tuberculosis drug discovery.

Sean Ekins, Joel S Freundlich, Inhee Choi, Malabika Sarker, Carolyn Talcott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Drug Discovery forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pangenome Analysis ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Molecule Property Analyses of Active Compounds forJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  6. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sean EkinsCollaborations in Chemistry, 601 Runnymede Avenue, Jenkintown, PA 19046, USA. ekinssean@yahoo.com
Joel S Freundlich
Inhee Choi
Malabika Sarker
Carolyn Talcott

Funding

Identification of novel therapeutics for tuberculosis combining cheminformatics,R41AI088893 · NIAID · COLLABORATIVE DRUG DISCOVERY, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2010 to 2010
$149k
NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI088893NIAID NIH HHS R41AI088893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are witnessing the growing menace of both increasing cases of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and the challenge to produce the first new tuberculosis (TB) drug in well over 40 years. The TB community, having invested in extensive high-throughput screening efforts, is faced with the question of how to optimally leverage these data to move from a hit to a lead to a clinical candidate and potentially, a new drug. Complementing this approach, yet conducted on a much smaller scale, cheminformatic techniques have been leveraged and are examined in this review. We suggest that these computational approaches should be optimally integrated within a workflow with experimental approaches to accelerate TB drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAntitubercular AgentsDatabases, FactualHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID21129975
PMCPMC3034835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.