Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21129846›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2011

Phase 1 and 2 studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of intraprostatic injection of PRX302 for the targeted treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Samuel R Denmeade, Blair Egerdie, Gary Steinhoff, Rosemina Merchant, Ralph Abi-Habib, Peter Pommerville

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel R DenmeadeSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. denmesa@jhmi.edu
Blair Egerdie
Gary Steinhoff
Rosemina Merchant
Ralph Abi-Habib
Peter Pommerville
Huntington Society of Canada · CASidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

NIMHD NIH HHS L32 MD000982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPRX302 is a prostate specific antigen (PSA)-activated pore-forming protein toxin under development as a targeted approach for improving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) without affecting sexual function.

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of PRX302 in men with moderate to severe BPH. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsEligible subjects were refractory, intolerant, or unwilling to undergo medical therapies for BPH and had International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥12, a quality of life (QoL) score ≥3, and prostate volumes between 30 and 80 g. Fifteen patients were enrolled in phase 1 studies, and 18 patients entered phase 2 studies.

interventionsSubjects received intraprostatic injection of PRX302 into the right and left transition zone via a transperineal approach in an office-based setting. Phase 1 subjects received increasing concentrations of PRX302 at a fixed volume; phase 2 subjects received increasing volumes per deposit at a fixed concentration. MEASUREMENTS: IPSS, QoL, prostate volume, maximum flow rate (Q(max)), International Index of Erectile Function, serum PSA levels, pharmacokinetics, and adverse events were recorded at 30, 60, 90, 180, 270, and 360 d after treatment with PRX302. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sixty percent of men in the phase 1 study and 64% of men in the phase 2 study treated with PRX302 had ≥30% improvement compared to baseline in IPSS out to day 360. Patients also experienced improvement in QoL and reduction in prostate volume out to day 360. Patients receiving ≥1 ml of PRX302 per deposit had the best response overall. PRX302 had no deleterious effect on erectile function. Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient in nature. The major study limitation was the small sample size.

conclusionsThe promising safety profile and evidence of efficacy in the majority of treated subjects in these phase 1 and 2 studies supports further development of PRX302 as a minimally invasive, targeted treatment for BPH.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBacterial ToxinsCanadaHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedPenile ErectionPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic HyperplasiaQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsBacterial ToxinsPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsProstate-Specific AntigenPRX302

Identifiers

PMID21129846
PMCPMC3454506
OpenAlexW2037473701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.