Trial reportEuropean urology2011
Phase 1 and 2 studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of intraprostatic injection of PRX302 for the targeted treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Trial report in European urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective, randomized, double-blind, vehicle controlled, multicenter phase IIb clinical trial of the pore forming protein PRX302 for targeted treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.The Journal of urology · 2013Trial
- [Minimally invasive treatment options for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021Article
- New Ultra-minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.European urology open science · 2021Review
- A state-of-art review on the preservation of sexual function among various minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Impact on erectile and ejaculatory domains.Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Review
- Microparticle Encapsulation of a Prostate-targeted Biologic for the Treatment of Liver Metastases in a Preclinical Model of Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2020Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells and the embryonic reawakening theory of BPH.Nature reviews. Urology · 2018Review
- PSA-selective activation of cytotoxic human serine proteases within the tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic strategy to target prostate cancer.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Clinical evaluation of embolization of the superior vesical prostatic artery for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center retrospective study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2017Article
- Minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hypertrophy: The rise in minimally invasive surgical therapies.Prostate international · 2017Review
- [Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Review
- Observational
- New medical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia and future perspectives.BMC urology · 2016Review
- Apoptotic Pathways Linked to Endocrine System as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
- A prodrug-doped cellular Trojan Horse for the potential treatment of prostate cancer.Biomaterials · 2016Article
- Phospho-MEK1/2 and uPAR Expression Determine Sensitivity of AML Blasts to a Urokinase-Activated Anthrax Lethal Toxin (PrAgU2/LF).Translational oncology · 2015Article
- New intraprostatic injectables and prostatic urethral lift for male LUTS.Nature reviews. Urology · 2015Review
- Minimally invasive devices for treating lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostate hyperplasia: technology update.Research and reports in urology · 2015Review
- Pharmacokinetics and toxicology of a fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-activated prodrug in murine xenograft models of human cancer.The Prostate · 2014Article
- Enhancement of the T-cell armamentarium as a cell-based therapy for prostate cancer.Cancer research · 2014Article
- Landmarks in BPH--from aetiology to medical and surgical management.Nature reviews. Urology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPRX302 is a prostate specific antigen (PSA)-activated pore-forming protein toxin under development as a targeted approach for improving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) without affecting sexual function.
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of PRX302 in men with moderate to severe BPH. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsEligible subjects were refractory, intolerant, or unwilling to undergo medical therapies for BPH and had International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥12, a quality of life (QoL) score ≥3, and prostate volumes between 30 and 80 g. Fifteen patients were enrolled in phase 1 studies, and 18 patients entered phase 2 studies.
interventionsSubjects received intraprostatic injection of PRX302 into the right and left transition zone via a transperineal approach in an office-based setting. Phase 1 subjects received increasing concentrations of PRX302 at a fixed volume; phase 2 subjects received increasing volumes per deposit at a fixed concentration. MEASUREMENTS: IPSS, QoL, prostate volume, maximum flow rate (Q(max)), International Index of Erectile Function, serum PSA levels, pharmacokinetics, and adverse events were recorded at 30, 60, 90, 180, 270, and 360 d after treatment with PRX302. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sixty percent of men in the phase 1 study and 64% of men in the phase 2 study treated with PRX302 had ≥30% improvement compared to baseline in IPSS out to day 360. Patients also experienced improvement in QoL and reduction in prostate volume out to day 360. Patients receiving ≥1 ml of PRX302 per deposit had the best response overall. PRX302 had no deleterious effect on erectile function. Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient in nature. The major study limitation was the small sample size.
conclusionsThe promising safety profile and evidence of efficacy in the majority of treated subjects in these phase 1 and 2 studies supports further development of PRX302 as a minimally invasive, targeted treatment for BPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.