Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21129208›Full record

ArticleTrials2010

A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (the SuDDICU study).

B H Cuthbertson, J Francis, M K Campbell, L MacIntyre, I Seppelt, J Grimshaw, SuDDICU study groups

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02389036 (A Crossover, Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in Intensive Care Unit Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02389036 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Crossover, Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in Intensive Care Unit Patients (SuDDICU)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe George InstituteRan2017 to 2023Enrolled20,010ConditionsCritical Illness, Sepsis, Septic Shock, Ventilator Associated PneumoniaArmsSDD Oral Paste, SDD Gastric Suspension, Intravenous Antibiotic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Barriers and Facilitators of Intensivists' Adherence to Hyperinsulinemia-Euglycemia Therapy in the Treatment of Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

B H CuthbertsonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Av, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. brian.cuthbertson@sunnybrook.ca
J Francis
M K Campbell
L MacIntyre
I Seppelt
J Grimshaw
SuDDICU study groups
Canadian Institutes of Health Research · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CANepean Hospital · AUUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1CIHRDepartment of Health 09/01/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital acquired infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and markedly increased health care costs. Critically ill patients who require management in an Intensive Care Unit are particularly susceptible to these infections which are associated with a very high mortality. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) may reduce these infections and improve mortality but it has not been widely adopted into practice. We aim to 1. Clarify reasons why clinicians have avoided implementing SDD into clinical practice despite the current best-evidence 2. Describe barriers to SDD implementation and 3. Identify what further evidence is required before full scale clinical implementation would be considered appropriate and feasible.

methodsWe have developed an international 'multi-lens' approach to investigate SDD from several perspectives. In case studies we will identify accounts of implementation of SDD in practice, in terms of the behaviours performed by the full range of individual clinicians, accounts of how SDD was first introduced into the Unit and specific content that may be used to populate the content of behaviour change techniques to be used in an implementation intervention and procedures to consider in order to deliver an implementation trial. In a 4 round Delphi study we will identify the range of stakeholders' beliefs, views and perceived barriers relating to the use of SDD. We will generate hypotheses about key beliefs about SDD and will inform the feasibility of any future randomised controlled trial. In large-scale nationwide postal questionnaire surveys of the state of current practice we will identify the factors predicting acceptability of an effectiveness or implementation trial using, and informed by, the theoretical domains structure. In semi-structured interviews with active international clinical trialists we will assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial and identify challenges and barriers to undertaking research in the field of SDD research. DISCUSSION: We believe these methods will allow us to determine whether clinical implementation trials or further large effectiveness trials are required before full scale implementation into clinical practice.

Indexed as

DecontaminationIntensive Care UnitsAdultClinical ProtocolsCritical IllnessCross InfectionGastrointestinal TractHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21129208
PMCPMC3017022
OpenAlexW2119153861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.