ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
Merged consensus clustering to assess and improve class discovery with microarray data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated multi-omic and symptom clustering reveals lower-gastrointestinal disorders of gut-brain interaction heterogeneity.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Ensemble clustering: A practical tutorial.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- BioNAR: an integrated biological network analysis package in bioconductor.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Unsupervised Algorithms for Microarray Sample Stratification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Dissecting the Shared and Context-Dependent Pathways Mediated by the p140Cap Adaptor Protein in Cancer and in Neurons.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019Article
- Article
- Proteomic analysis of postsynaptic proteins in regions of the human neocortex.Nature neuroscience · 2018Article
- Revealing common disease mechanisms shared by tumors of different tissues of origin through semantic representation of genomic alterations and topic modeling.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Synaptic Interactome Mining Reveals p140Cap as a New Hub for PSD Proteins Involved in Psychiatric and Neurological Disorders.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017Article
- Conservation of immune gene signatures in solid tumors and prognostic implications.BMC cancer · 2016Article
- Learning a hierarchical representation of the yeast transcriptomic machinery using an autoencoder model.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Is there still a French eating model? A taxonomy of eating behaviors in adults living in the Paris metropolitan area in 2010.PloS one · 2015Article
- An alternative to current psychiatric classifications: a psychological landscape hypothesis based on an integrative, dynamical and multidimensional approach.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2014Article
- Semi-supervised consensus clustering for gene expression data analysis.BioData mining · 2014Article
- On the amyloid datasets used for training PAFIG--how (not) to extend the experimental dataset of hexapeptides.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Distinct signaling roles of ceramide species in yeast revealed through systematic perturbation and systems biology analyses.Science signaling · 2013Article
- Interplay of microRNAs, transcription factors and target genes: linking dynamic expression changes to function.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Discovering subgroups of patients from DNA copy number data using NMF on compacted matrices.PloS one · 2013Article
- Genomic signatures characterize leukocyte infiltration in myositis muscles.BMC medical genomics · 2012Article
- Epigenomic analysis detects widespread gene-body DNA hypomethylation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Nature genetics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne of the most commonly performed tasks when analysing high throughput gene expression data is to use clustering methods to classify the data into groups. There are a large number of methods available to perform clustering, but it is often unclear which method is best suited to the data and how to quantify the quality of the classifications produced.
resultsHere we describe an R package containing methods to analyse the consistency of clustering results from any number of different clustering methods using resampling statistics. These methods allow the identification of the the best supported clusters and additionally rank cluster members by their fidelity within the cluster. These metrics allow us to compare the performance of different clustering algorithms under different experimental conditions and to select those that produce the most reliable clustering structures. We show the application of this method to simulated data, canonical gene expression experiments and our own novel analysis of genes involved in the specification of the peripheral nervous system in the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster.
conclusionsOur package enables users to apply the merged consensus clustering methodology conveniently within the R programming environment, providing both analysis and graphical display functions for exploring clustering approaches. It extends the basic principle of consensus clustering by allowing the merging of results between different methods to provide an averaged clustering robustness. We show that this extension is useful in correcting for the tendency of clustering algorithms to treat outliers differently within datasets. The R package, clusterCons, is freely available at CRAN and sourceforge under the GNU public licence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.