Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21128819›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2011

Selection of treatment among Latina and non-Latina white women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Celia P Kaplan, Anna M Nápoles, E Shelley Hwang, Joan Bloom, Susan Stewart, Dana Nickleach, Leah Karliner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02248662 (Impact of Radiation Therapy on Breast Conservation in DCIS), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02248662 completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Radiation Therapy on Breast Conservation in DCIS

TypeobservationalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2013 to 2017Enrolled3,436ConditionsDCIS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of primary/preferred language data collection.Journal of registry management · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Celia P KaplanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0856, USA. celia.kaplan@ucsf.edu
Anna M Nápoles
E Shelley Hwang
Joan Bloom
Susan Stewart
Dana Nickleach
Leah Karliner
University of California, San Francisco · USBerkeley Public Health Division · US

Funding

Primary Hormonal Therpay for DCIS of the BreastK23CA097181 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HWANG, E.SHELLEY · 2004 to 2008
$636k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA097181NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035136NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035139NCI NIH HHS N02 PC015105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing rates of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and evidence that Latinas may underuse breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with white women highlight the need to better understand how treatment decisions are made in this understudied group. To help address this gap, this study compared surgery and radiation treatment decision making among white and Spanish-speaking and English-speaking Latina women with DCIS recruited from eight population-based cancer registries from 35 California counties.

methodsWomen aged ≥18 who self-identified as Latina or non-Latina white diagnosed with DCIS between 2002 and 2005 were selected from eight California Cancer Registry (CCR) regions and surveyed about their DCIS treatment decision making by telephone approximately 24 months after diagnosis. Survey data were merged with CCR hospital-based records to obtain tumor and treatment data.

resultsMean age was 57 years. Multivariate analysis indicated no differences by ethnicity or language in the receipt of mastectomy vs. BCS after controlling demographic, health, and personal preferences. English-speaking Latinas were more likely to receive radiation than their Spanish-speaking or white counterparts, controlling for demographic and other factors. Among women receiving BCS, physician recommendation was the strongest predictor of receipt of radiation.

conclusionsEthnic disparities in surgical treatment choices after breast cancer diagnosis were not seen in this cohort of women diagnosed with DCIS. Physicians play an essential role in patients' treatment choices for DCIS, particularly for adjuvant radiation.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude to HealthBreast NeoplasmsCaliforniaCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCohort StudiesCultural CharacteristicsFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient PreferenceSurveys and QuestionnairesWhite PeopleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21128819
PMCPMC4955605
OpenAlexW1978477242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.