Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21128060›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2010

Safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Takahiro Tsushima, Shuichi Hironaka, Narikazu Boku, Nozomu Machida, Kentaro Yamazaki, Hirofumi Yasui, Keisei Taku, Akira Fukutomi, Yusuke Onozawa

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Systemic therapy strategies for elderly patients with gastric cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Retrospective study of unplanned hospital admission for metastatic cancer patients visiting the emergency department.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  9. Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients: clinicopathological, prognostic factors and treatments.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Safety and feasibility of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in elderly patients.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Takahiro TsushimaShizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi-cho, Japan.
Shuichi Hironaka
Narikazu Boku
Nozomu Machida
Kentaro Yamazaki
Hirofumi Yasui
Keisei Taku
Akira Fukutomi
Yusuke Onozawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough S-1 is effective against advanced gastric cancer (AGC), its efficacy in elderly patients has not yet been investigated sufficiently. We assessed the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with AGC.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of the data of 153 patients with unresectable/recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma who received S-1 monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy at our institution. S-1 was administered orally twice daily at the dose of 40 mg/m², on days 1-28, every 6 weeks. We categorized the patients into three groups, the young (≤65 years old), the middle-aged (66-75 years old), and the elderly (≥76 years old); and the drug toxicity, objective responses, progression-free survivals, and overall survivals were compared among the three groups.

resultsThe incidence of leukopenia of grade 3 or greater in the three groups was 7%, 5%, and 13%, and that of anemia was 9%, 18%, and 27%, respectively. In regard to nonhematological toxicities, the incidence of nausea of grade 3 or greater was 3%, 5%, and 13%; that of fatigue was 5%, 11%, and 20%; and that of anorexia was 5%, 6%, and 27%, respectively. As for the treatment efficacy, the objective response rates, median progressionfree survivals, and overall survivals in the young, middle-aged, and elderly groups were 53%, 46%, and 33%; 7.8, 5.6, and 3.9 months; and 16.9, 17.1; and 7.7 months, respectively.

conclusionAlthough S-1 monotherapy showed moderate efficacy in elderly (≥76 years) patients with AGC, patients in this age group showed higher incidences of severe toxicities than the younger patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnemiaAnorexiaAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticChemotherapy, AdjuvantDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsFatigueFemaleHumansLeukopeniaMaleAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDrug CombinationsOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafur

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.