Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21127976›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2011

Performance parameters of the conventional serological markers for autoimmune hepatitis.

Albert J Czaja

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Overview.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Approach to the patient with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Role of Biologics in the Development of Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Review.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. The Saudi association for the study of liver diseases and transplantation clinical practice guidelines for management of autoimmune hepatitis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Albert J CzajaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. czaja.albert@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutoimmune hepatitis is defined by a conventional battery of autoantibodies that may also be present in other liver diseases.

aimsTo define the performance parameters of the conventional autoantibodies for autoimmune hepatitis, determine the diagnostic implications of simultaneous autoantibody production, and assess the performances of serological assays based on indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay.

methodsIn this study, 265 adults satisfying codified criteria for autoimmune hepatitis and 342 adults who satisfied conventional diagnostic criteria for another chronic liver disease were each assessed for the conventional autoantibodies.

resultsAntinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, and antibodies to liver kidney type 1 had sensitivities of only 32, 16, and 1%, respectively, for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and their diagnostic accuracy ranged from 56 to 61%. The combination of antinuclear antibodies and smooth muscle antibodies at presentation had superior sensitivity (43%), specificity (99%), positive (97%) and negative (69%) predictabilities, and diagnostic accuracy (74%) than each marker alone. The occurrence of multiple autoantibodies was lower in other chronic liver diseases than in autoimmune hepatitis (8% versus 51%, p < 0.000001). The enzyme immunoassay for antinuclear antibodies had an accuracy that was not discriminative for autoimmune hepatitis (p = 0.06).

conclusionsIsolated autoantibodies have a low diagnostic accuracy for autoimmune hepatitis. Concurrent antinuclear antibodies and smooth muscle antibodies have superior performance parameters. The enzyme immunoassay for antinuclear antibodies performs less well than the assay based on indirect immunofluorescence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutoantibodiesFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHepatitis, AutoimmuneHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSerologic TestsYoung AdultAutoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID21127976
OpenAlexW2018464534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.