Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21127950›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2011

Rural workers' experience of low back pain: exploring why they continue to work.

Sarah G Dean, Sheena Hudson, E Jean C Hay-Smith, Stephan Milosavljevic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A perspective on the role of language about pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Need for School Nursing in Spain: A Mixed Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sarah G DeanPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Exeter, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter EX2 4SG, UK. sarah.dean@pms.ac.uk
Sheena Hudson
E Jean C Hay-Smith
Stephan Milosavljevic
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany New Zealand rural workers have repeated low back pain (LBP) episodes yet continue to work. We wanted to find out why, given that other manual workers with LBP often end up on long term sick leave or permanently disabled.

methodsOur primarily qualitative approach used mixed methods to investigate rural workers with non-specific LBP. Participants (n = 33) were surveyed for demographic data, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and the General Self Efficacy Scale followed by one-to-one semi-structured interviews. Analysis ranged from descriptive content to detailed qualitative Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

resultsParticipants had high self efficacy scores, positive perceptions about LBP but strong beliefs that LBP is lifelong. Four distinct themes emerged. "Thinking with my head before my back" and "Knowing the risks" described participants' innovation regarding job modifications. "Just carry on" and "Love of the land" related to stoical resilience and commitment to something more than employment.

conclusionsThis rural workforce adopts a 'can do' attitude to work, managing LBP within the context of having job control and flexible work practices. IMPLICATIONS: Rehabilitation interventions promoting job control and targeting positive attitudes towards getting on with work, whilst accepting LBP as part of everyday life, may have merit for other workers with LBP.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRural PopulationSelf EfficacyAdultAgricultureFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandSurveys and QuestionnairesWork

Identifiers

PMID21127950
OpenAlexW1986397716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.