Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21127848›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of membrane biology2011

Arginine in membranes: the connection between molecular dynamics simulations and translocon-mediated insertion experiments.

Eric V Schow, J Alfredo Freites, Philip C. Myint, Andreas Bernsel, Gunnar von Heijne, Stephen H White, Douglas J Tobias

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of membrane biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric V SchowDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
J Alfredo Freites
Philip C. Myint
Andreas Bernsel
Gunnar von Heijne
Stephen H White
Douglas J Tobias
University of California, Irvine · USStockholm University · SE

Funding

Project 3: Structural Studies of Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels as FunctionP01GM086685 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WORCESTER, DAVID · 2009 to 2013
$6.7M
Membrane Protein Folding and AssemblyR01GM074637 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WHITE, STEPHEN H. · 2006 to 2020
$4.5M
European Research Council 232648NIGMS NIH HHS GM746373NIGMS NIH HHS GM86685NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM086685NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074637NLM NIH HHS 5 T15 LM00744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several laboratories have carried out molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of arginine interactions with lipid bilayers and found that the energetic cost of placing arginine in lipid bilayers is an order of magnitude greater than observed in molecular biology experiments in which Arg-containing transmembrane helices are inserted across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by the Sec61 translocon. We attempt here to reconcile the results of the two approaches. We first present MD simulations of guanidinium groups alone in lipid bilayers, and then, to mimic the molecular biology experiments, we present simulations of hydrophobic helices containing single Arg residues at different positions along the helix. We discuss the simulation results in the context of molecular biology results and show that the energetic discrepancy is reduced, but not eliminated, by considering free energy differences between Arg at the interface and at the center of the model helices. The reduction occurs because Arg snorkeling to the interface prevents Arg from residing in the bilayer center where the energetic cost of desolvation is highest. We then show that the problem with MD simulations is that they measure water-to-bilayer free energies, whereas the molecular biology experiments measure the energetics of partitioning from translocon to bilayer, which raises the fundamental question of the relationship between water-to-bilayer and water-to-translocon partitioning. We present two thermodynamic scenarios as a foundation for reconciliation of the simulation and molecular biology results. The simplest scenario is that translocon-to-bilayer partitioning is independent of water-to-bilayer partitioning; there is no thermodynamic cycle connecting the two paths.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationArginineGuanidineIon TransportLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsMembranesPeptidesThermodynamicsWaterArginineGuanidineLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsPeptidespolyleucineWater

Identifiers

PMID21127848
PMCPMC3030942
OpenAlexW2103292783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.