Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21125407›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2011

Problems with 'focal segmental glomerulosclerosis'.

Alexander J Howie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Genetic testing in renal disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2012
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander J HowieDepartment of Pathology, University College London, London, WC1E 6JJ, UK. a.j.howie@medsch.ucl.ac.uk
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term 'focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)' has been applied to many different conditions. All classifications of 'FSGS', including those describing 'variants', perpetuate the misconceptions that the entities included have something in common and that the term 'FSGS' has some value. With a rigorous approach to renal biopsies showing segmental lesions, especially with knowledge of clinical circumstances and with detailed analysis of features such as the appearance of lesions and their position within glomeruli, a pathologist can provide information that is clinically more useful than merely the bald diagnosis 'FSGS'. More precise terms should be used. 'Overload changes' can be used to describe the changes seen in reduced renal mass. 'Tip changes' can be seen in many conditions and are not a disease in themselves. 'The glomerular tip lesion as originally defined' means the occurrence of tip changes in otherwise normal glomeruli, in the nephrotic syndrome. 'Early classical segmental sclerosing glomerulopathy' is the combination of tip changes and otherwise abnormal glomeruli, in the nephrotic syndrome. 'Late classical segmental sclerosing glomerulopathy' means segmental lesions at various sites within glomeruli, in the nephrotic syndrome. 'Collapsing glomerulopathy' is distinctive, and its inclusion in classifications emphasises the lack of specificity of 'FSGS'.

Indexed as

Glomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalHumans

Identifiers

PMID21125407
OpenAlexW2170684059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.