ReviewJournal of applied genetics2011
In vitro culturing of ciliary respiratory cells--a model for studies of genetic diseases.
Review in Journal of applied genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organotypic Airway Models Derived from Primary Human Nasal Epithelial Cells.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Long-term differentiating primary human airway epithelial cell cultures: how far are we?Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2021Review
- Aminoglycoside-stimulated readthrough of premature termination codons in selected genes involved in primary ciliary dyskinesia.RNA biology · 2016Article
- Article
- Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: An Update on New Diagnostic Modalities and Review of the Literature.Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology · 2014Review
- Engineering functional epithelium for regenerative medicine and in vitro organ models: a review.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2013Review
- Comparison of human nasal epithelial cells grown as explant outgrowth cultures or dissociated tissue cultures in vitro.Frontiers of medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare genetic disorder caused by the impaired functioning of ciliated cells. Its diagnosis is based on the analysis of the structure and functioning of cilia present in the respiratory epithelium (RE) of the patient. Abnormalities of cilia caused by hereditary mutations closely resemble and often overlap with defects induced by the environmental factors. As a result, proper diagnosis of PCD is difficult and may require repeated sampling of patients' tissue, which is not always possible. The culturing of differentiated cells and tissues derived from the human RE seems to be the best way to diagnose PCD, to study genotype-phenotype relations of genes involved in ciliary dysfunction, as well as other aspects related to the functioning of the RE. In this review, different methods of culturing differentiated cells and tissues derived from the human RE, along with their potential and limitations, are summarized. Several considerations with respect to the factors influencing the process of in vitro differentiation (cell-to-cell interactions, medium composition, cell-support substrate) are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.