Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21125353›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2011

Identification of left ventricular myocardial ischemia and cardiac prognosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: updates from 2008 to 2010.

Runyawan Chotenimitkhun, W Gregory Hundley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Runyawan ChotenimitkhunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1045, USA.
W Gregory Hundley

Funding

Wake Forest Claude D. Pepper OAIC - RenewalP30AG021332 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jamie Nicole Justice · 2002 to 2026
$36.4M
WORKER PROTECTION AGAINST AIRBORNE INFLUENZA - A PILOT STUDYM01RR007122 · NCRR · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUNDLEY, WILLIAM GREGORY · 1992 to 2010
$35.2M
Vascular Stiffness and Pulmonary CongestionR01HL076438 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUNDLEY, WILLIAM GREGORY · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
Optimized CMR imaging of chemotherapy cardiotoxicityR33CA121296 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUNDLEY, WILLIAM GREGORY · 2007 to 2009
$716k
Multidisciplinary Training in Cardiovascular ImagingT32HL091824 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUNDLEY, WILLIAM GREGORY · 2009 to 2013
$707k
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA121296NCI NIH HHS R33CA1219601NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR007122NCRR NIH HHS MO1-RR07122NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076438NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL076438NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL091824NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL091824NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021332NIA NIH HHS P30AG21332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive imaging modalities are often used to manage patients with cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used for diagnosing and evaluating myocardial ischemia and viability; moreover, stress CMR study results can be used to determine cardiac prognosis. In this article, we review recently published material regarding the performance of stress testing with CMR including a brief update regarding techniques, stress agents, diagnostic accuracy, prognosis, economic implications, and ongoing trials and future developments.

Indexed as

DobutamineExercise TestHeart VentriclesHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsVentricular Dysfunction, LeftDobutamine

Identifiers

PMID21125353
PMCPMC3767037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.