Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21124768›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2010

Safety of the malaria vaccine candidate, RTS,S/AS01E in 5 to 17 month old Kenyan and Tanzanian Children.

John Lusingu, Ally Olotu, Amanda Leach, Marc Lievens, Johan Vekemans, Aurélie Olivier, Sarah Benns, Raimos Olomi, Salum Msham, Trudie Lang and 22 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00380393 (A Study of the Efficacy Against Episodes of Clinical Malaria Due to P. Falciparum Infection of GSK Biologicals Candidate Vaccine RTS,S/AS01, Administered According to a 0,1,2-months Schedule in Children Aged 5 to 17 Months Living in Tanzania & Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00380393 phase2completednot on this map

A Study of the Efficacy Against Episodes of Clinical Malaria Due to P. Falciparum Infection of GSK Biologicals Candidate Vaccine RTS,S/AS01, Administered According to a 0,1,2-months Schedule in Children Aged 5 to 17 Months Living in Tanzania & Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2007 to 2008Enrolled894ConditionsMalariaArmsGSK malaria vaccine 257049 Vaccine, Sanofi-Pasteur's Human Diploid Cell Rabies Vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

John LusinguNational Institute for Medical Research, Tanga, Tanzania.
Ally Olotu
Amanda Leach
Marc Lievens
Johan Vekemans
Aurélie Olivier
Sarah Benns
Raimos Olomi
Salum Msham
Trudie Lang
Jayne Gould
Karin Hallez
Yolanda Guerra
Patricia Njuguna
Ken O Awuondo
Anangisye Malabeja
Omar Abdul
Samwel Gesase
Denise Dekker
Lincoln Malle
Sadiki Ismael
Neema Mturi
Chris J Drakeley
Barbara Savarese
Tonya Villafana
W Ripley Ballou
Joe Cohen
Eleanor M Riley
Martha M Lemnge
Kevin Marsh
Philip Bejon
Lorenz von Seidlein
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BENational Institute for Medical Research · TZKenya Medical Research Institute · KEAfrican Malaria Network Trust · TZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBU.S. President's Malaria Initiative · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The malaria vaccine candidate, RTS,S/AS01(E), showed promising protective efficacy in a trial of Kenyan and Tanzanian children aged 5 to 17 months. Here we report on the vaccine's safety and tolerability. The experimental design was a Phase 2b, two-centre, double-blind (observer- and participant-blind), randomised (1∶1 ratio) controlled trial. Three doses of study or control (rabies) vaccines were administered intramuscularly at 1 month intervals. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days after each vaccination. There was surveillance and reporting for unsolicited adverse events for 30 days after each vaccination. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded throughout the study period which lasted for 14 months after dose 1 in Korogwe, Tanzania and an average of 18 months post-dose 1 in Kilifi, Kenya. Blood samples for safety monitoring of haematological, renal and hepatic functions were taken at baseline, 3, 10 and 14 months after dose 1. A total of 894 children received RTS,S/AS01(E) or rabies vaccine between March and August 2007. Overall, children vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01(E) had fewer SAEs (51/447) than children in the control group (88/447). One SAE episode in a RTS,S/AS01(E) recipient and nine episodes among eight rabies vaccine recipients met the criteria for severe malaria. Unsolicited AEs were reported in 78% of subjects in the RTS,S/AS01(E) group and 74% of subjects in the rabies vaccine group. In both vaccine groups, gastroenteritis and pneumonia were the most frequently reported unsolicited AE. Fever was the most frequently observed solicited AE and was recorded after 11% of RTS,S/AS01(E) doses compared to 31% of doses of rabies vaccine. The candidate vaccine RTS,S/AS01(E) showed an acceptable safety profile in children living in a malaria-endemic area in East Africa. More data on the safety of RTS,S/AS01(E) will become available from the Phase 3 programme.

Indexed as

Alanine TransaminaseCreatinineDouble-Blind MethodFeverGastroenteritisHumansInfantKenyaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPainPlasmodium falciparumPneumoniaRabies VaccinesSleep StagesTanzaniaAlanine TransaminaseCreatinineMalaria VaccinesRabies VaccinesRTS,S-AS01E vaccine

Identifiers

PMID21124768
PMCPMC2993932
OpenAlexW2075725636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.