Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21123768›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2010

Use of patient-reported outcomes in medical product development: a report from the 2009 NEI/FDA Clinical Trial Endpoints Symposium.

Rohit Varma, Elaine A Richman, Frederick L Ferris, Neil M Bressler

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Patient-reported outcomes and measures applied in individuals undergoing colonoscopy surveillance for colorectal cancer: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Translation, cultural adaptation, and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Arabic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (Ar-GerdQ).Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Amblyopia and the whole child.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Current Endpoints of Clinical Trials in Ulcerative Colitis: Are They Valid?Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rohit VarmaDoheny Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. rvarma@usc.edu
Elaine A Richman
Frederick L Ferris
Neil M Bressler

Funding

LOS ANGELES LATINO EYE STUDYU10EY011753 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VARMA, ROHIT · 1998 to 2014
$35.6M
NEI NIH HHS EY11753NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Endpoint DeterminationPatient SatisfactionSickness Impact ProfileClinical Trials as TopicDrug LabelingEquipment and SuppliesHumansNational Eye Institute (U.S.)OphthalmologyOutcome Assessment, Health CareUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationValidation Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21123768
PMCPMC3055746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.