Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21123639›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2010

Improving the differential diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.

David B Price, Barbara P Yawn, Rupert C M Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Romanian clinical guideline for diagnosis and treatment of COPD.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Awareness of COPD and Its Risk Factors Among the Adult Population of the Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  8. Imaging in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a window into the disease.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Brazilian studies on pulmonary function in COPD patients: what are the gaps?International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Review
  12. Diagnosis, assessment, and phenotyping of COPD: beyond FEV₁.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2014
    Review
  18. Risk-to-benefit ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The safety of long-acting β2-agonists in the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David B PriceCenter of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Center, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, Scotland. david@respiratoryresearch.org
Barbara P Yawn
Rupert C M Jones
Olmsted Medical Center · USUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma represent a substantial portion of primary care practice. In adults, differentiating asthma from COPD can be difficult but is important because of the marked differences in treatment, disease progression, and outcomes between the 2 conditions. Currently, clinical COPD is often misdiagnosed or undiagnosed until late in the disease. Earlier diagnosis could markedly reduce morbidity and improve quality of life. Establishing a diagnosis of COPD requires spirometry testing, interpreted in the context of the patient's symptoms, smoking status, age, and comorbidities. Additional tests and tools may be helpful in the differential diagnosis, including questionnaires specifically developed to discriminate between COPD and asthma and, in special cases, imaging studies. Follow-up and monitoring of asthma and COPD are always necessary and provide additional benefit in patients in whom only continued care and reassessment can confirm the final diagnosis, such as younger individuals with fixed airway obstruction, smokers with asthma, and patients with both disorders. Key areas for improvement include enhanced case identification, improved quality and interpretation of findings on spirometry, and increased use of tools such as differential diagnosis questionnaires and algorithms to guide the diagnostic and monitoring process. To achieve optimal outcomes, the primary care team should make every effort to establish a firm diagnosis. For this review, we conducted a PubMed search with no time limits using the Medical Subject Headings chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or COPD and asthma, in association with the following search terms: diagnosis, differential diagnosis, mixed or comorbid disease, diagnostic techniques, spirometry, questionnaires, and primary care.

Indexed as

AdultAsthmaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID21123639
PMCPMC2996146
OpenAlexW2014041410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.