ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2010
Carotid stenting vs endarterectomy: new results in perspective.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- An In Vivo Study on the Feasibility of Catheter-Assisted Pulsed Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Atherosclerotic Plaques.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- A feasibility study on removing lipid deposition in atherosclerotic plaques with ultrasound-assisted laser ablation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Outcomes Following Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center in South Korea.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Carotid artery endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid artery disease.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2022Article
- Patient-Tailored Stenting versus Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Risk Factors for Residual Stenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- The utility of adjunctive electroencephalography while performing transcarotid artery revascularization.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2019Article
- Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting and Embolic Protection.Current cardiology reports · 2017Review
- Evaluation and Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2017Review
- Safety Outcomes Using a Proximal Protection Device in Carotid Stenting of Long Carotid Stenoses.Interventional neurology · 2016Article
- Orthopantomography contribution to prevent isquemic stroke.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2014Article
- Management of carotid artery stenosis: endarterectomy or stenting?Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carotid artery stenosis is a major risk factor for stroke, and treatments for this condition to decrease the risk of stroke include medical therapy, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and, more recently, carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of CEA vs medical therapy showed a clear benefit for CEA in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of greater than 70% and a lesser benefit in patients with 50% to 69% stenosis. Treatments have evolved in the ensuing 20 years, and a new method, CAS, has emerged as a possible alternative to CEA. In early results, CAS proved feasible but did not compare favorably with CEA. Later and larger-scale studies comparing CAS to CEA failed to reach conclusions regarding a clear neurologic outcome advantage of one method over the other. This subject was of sufficient interest that 2 larger-scale randomized controlled trials comparing CAS and CEA, the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial and the International Carotid Stenting Study, were undertaken to further explore this issue. This brief review places the new data arising from these studies in the context of prior efforts to address the problem of carotid artery stenosis and explores further opportunities for improvement and patient recommendations in light of these new findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.