Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21122555›Full record

ArticleJournal of Crohn's & colitis2010

Paneth's disease.

Jan Wehkamp, Eduard F Stange

RetractedErratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cross talk between Paneth and tuft cells drives dysbiosis and inflammation in the gut mucosa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Paneth cell α-defensins HD-5 and HD-6 display differential degradation into active antimicrobial fragments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Expression of concern · 2022-01-24Civil Proceedings · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Legal Reasons and/or Threats · · See also: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab225 Journal was previously published by Elsevier until 2015.
  • Commented on by
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan WehkampRobert-Bosch-Krankenhaus Stuttgart, Auerbachstr 110, 7076 Stuttgart, Germany. jan.wehkamp@ikp-stuttgart.de
Eduard F Stange
Robert Bosch Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In about 70% of patients Crohn's disease (CD) affects the small intestine. This disease location is stable over time and associated with a genetic background different from isolated colonic disease. A characteristic feature of small intestinal host defense is the presence of Paneth cells at the bottom of the crypts of Lieberkühn. These cells produce different broad spectrum antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) most abundantly the α-defensins HD-5 and -6 (DEFA5 und DEFA6). In small intestinal Crohn's disease both these PC products are specifically reduced. As a functional consequence, ileal extracts from Crohn's disease patients are compromised in clearing bacteria and enteroadherent E. coli colonize the mucosa. Mechanisms for defective antimicrobial Paneth cell function are complex and include an association with a NOD2 loss of function mutation, a disturbance of the Wnt pathway transcription factor TCF7L2 (also known as TCF4), the autophagy factor ATG16L1, the endosomal stress protein XBP1, the toll-like receptor TLR9, the calcium mediated potassium channel KCNN4 as well as mutations or inactivation of HD5. Thus we conclude that small intestinal Crohn's disease is most likely a complex disease of the Paneth cell: Paneth's disease.

Indexed as

alpha-DefensinsAnimalsAutophagy-Related ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCarrier ProteinsCrohn DiseaseDNA-Binding ProteinsGene ExpressionHumansIleitisImmunity, InnateImmunity, MucosalIntermediate-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsMiceMutationNod2 Signaling Adaptor Proteinalpha-DefensinsATG16L1 protein, humanAutophagy-Related ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCarrier ProteinsDEFA5 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsIntermediate-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsKCNN4 protein, humanNOD2 protein, humanNod2 Signaling Adaptor ProteinRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsTCF4 protein, humanTCF7L2 protein, humanTLR9 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 9Transcription Factor 4Transcription Factor 7-Like 2 ProteinTranscription FactorsWnt ProteinsX-Box Binding Protein 1XBP1 protein, humanXbp1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID21122555
OpenAlexW2030581533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.