Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21122473›Full record

ReviewDiscovery medicine2010

Targeting B cells for the treatment of SLE: the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning?

Ismael Calero, Iñaki Sanz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discovery medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Rationale for B cell targeting in SLE.Seminars in immunopathology · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. RP105-negative B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus.Clinical & developmental immunology · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Novel treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2011
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ismael CaleroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, Cuenca, Spain.
Iñaki Sanz
Hospital Virgen de la Luz · ES

Funding

Translational Research Project Effector and Regulatory B cells in SLEU19AI056390 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MOSMANN, TIM R. · 2003 to 2013
$8.9M
A Model System for the Study of Human B-cell ToleranceR37AI049660 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SANZ, IGNACIO E. · 2010 to 2019
$3.7M
A Model System for the Study of Human B-cell ToleranceR01AI049660 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SANZ, IGNACIO E. · 2003 to 2007
$1.6M
A Model System for the Study of Human B-cell ToleranceR56AI049660 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SANZ, IGNACIO E. · 2009 to 2009
$385k
IMMUNE FUNCTION AND BIODEFENSE IN CHILDREN. ELDERLY AND IMMUNOCOMPROMI-266050029N01AI050029 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SANZ, IGNACIO E. · 2006 to 2006
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI049660NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI050029NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI50029NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049660NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI049660NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI049660-07NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI049660NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI056390NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI56390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease for which therapeutic advances in immunosuppressive and support therapy have significantly improved survival over the last 5 decades. Unfortunately, SLE still carries substantially increased rates of mortality and end stage renal disease which are even more elevated in younger patients. No new drugs have been approved for SLE in over 50 years. Hence, a lot of hope and excitement has been generated by the development of biological agents designed to eliminate B cells either through direct killing (anti-B cell antibodies such as rituximab) or attrition by inhibition of survival (anti-BLyS/BAFF agents such as belimumab). Indeed a strong rationale for targeting B cells in SLE is supported by the major pathogenic roles they play in SLE through both autoantibody production and multiple antibody-independent functions. These hopes, however, have been darted by the failure of two different phase III randomized placebo-controlled trials of rituximab. Yet, clinicians continue to use rituximab off-label with the belief that it provides significant benefit and can rescue patients with disease that is refractory to current modalities. Moreover, recent positive results of two large controlled trials of belimumab have restored confidence that B cell targeting may after all be of benefit in SLE. In this review we discuss the background and rationale for the use of anti-B cell agents in SLE, review the available results, and provide models that could help reconcile the opposing results observed in different studies. These models could also help frame the design and evaluation of current and future B cell therapies.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesCell DeathHumansImmunologic MemoryLupus Erythematosus, SystemicLymphocyte Depletion

Identifiers

PMID21122473
PMCPMC4557964
OpenAlexW1236228614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.