ArticleBMC family practice2010
Assessing the evolution of primary healthcare organizations and their performance (2005-2010) in two regions of Québec province: Montréal and Montérégie.
Article in BMC family practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identification, summary and comparison of tools used to measure organizational attributes associated with chronic disease management within primary care settings.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2014Pooled it
- Evaluation of the implementation of an integrated primary care network for prevention and management of cardiometabolic risk in Montréal.BMC family practice · 2011Trial
- Patients' experience of integrated nursing care in general practices in Switzerland: a mixed-methods study.Family practice · 2025Article
- International cross-cultural development and field testing of the primary care practice questionnaire for the PaRIS survey (PaRIS-PCPQ).BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Reforms and innovations in primary health care in different countries: scoping review.Primary health care research & development · 2024Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform - A Scoping Literature Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Quality indicator framework for primary care of patients with dementia.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Description of organizational and clinician characteristics of primary dementia care in Canada: a multi-method study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Comparing the Attainment of the Patient's Medical Home Model across Regions in Three Canadian Provinces: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021Article
- Article
- Assessing care models implemented in primary healthcare for persons with dementia: a mixed-methods study protocol.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Explaining variation of implementation outcomes of centralized waiting lists for unattached patients.Journal of health organization and management · 2019Article
- Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- The OPTIMISE project: protocol for a mixed methods, pragmatic, quasi-experimental trial to improve primary care delivery to refugees in Australia.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Uncovering the wisdom hidden between the lines: the Collaborative Reflexive Deliberative Approach.Family practice · 2018Article
- What can organizations do to improve family physicians' interprofessional collaboration? Results of a survey of primary care in Quebec.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017Article
- Implementing Community Based Primary Healthcare for Older Adults with Complex Needs in Quebec, Ontario and New-Zealand: Describing Nine Cases.International journal of integrated care · 2017Article
- Do Gender-Predominant Primary Health Care Organizations Have an Impact on Patient Experience of Care, Use of Services, and Unmet Needs?Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing · 2017Article
- Impacts of Québec Primary Healthcare Reforms on Patients' Experience of Care, Unmet Needs, and Use of Services.International journal of family medicine · 2016Article
- Why Is Bigger Not Always Better in Primary Health Care Practices? The Role of Mediating Organizational Factors.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Canadian healthcare system is currently experiencing important organizational transformations through the reform of primary healthcare (PHC). These reforms vary in scope but share a common feature of proposing the transformation of PHC organizations by implementing new models of PHC organization. These models vary in their performance with respect to client affiliation, utilization of services, experience of care and perceived outcomes of care.
objectivesIn early 2005 we conducted a study in the two most populous regions of Quebec province (Montreal and Montérégie) which assessed the association between prevailing models of primary healthcare (PHC) and population-level experience of care. The goal of the present research project is to track the evolution of PHC organizational models and their relative performance through the reform process (from 2005 until 2010) and to assess factors at the organizational and contextual levels that are associated with the transformation of PHC organizations and their performance. METHODS/
designThis study will consist of three interrelated surveys, hierarchically nested. The first survey is a population-based survey of randomly-selected adults from two populous regions in the province of Quebec. This survey will assess the current affiliation of people with PHC organizations, their level of utilization of healthcare services, attributes of their experience of care, reception of preventive and curative services and perception of unmet needs for care. The second survey is an organizational survey of PHC organizations assessing aspects related to their vision, organizational structure, level of resources, and clinical practice characteristics. This information will serve to develop a taxonomy of organizations using a mixed methods approach of factorial analysis and principal component analysis. The third survey is an assessment of the organizational context in which PHC organizations are evolving. The five year prospective period will serve as a natural experiment to assess contextual and organizational factors (in 2005) associated with migration of PHC organizational models into new forms or models (in 2010) and assess the impact of this evolution on the performance of PHC. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will shed light on changes brought about in the organization of PHC and on factors associated with these changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.