Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21122040›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2011

Development and validation of an integrative scale to assess hope.

Beate Schrank, Andreas Woppmann, Ingrid Sibitz, Christoph Lauber

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The association between hope and mortality in homebound elders.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2017
    Article
  11. Informal caregivers of advanced-stage cancer patients: Every second is at risk for psychiatric morbidity.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Validation of the "Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness--Family Carer Version" (QOLLTI-F) in German-speaking carers of advanced cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beate SchrankDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Waehringerguertel, UK. beate.schrank@meduniwien.ac.at
Andreas Woppmann
Ingrid Sibitz
Christoph Lauber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHope includes the dimensions of time, goals, control, relations and personal characteristics. Existing tools that measure it vary in length and psychometric properties and cover different parts of its overall concept.

objectivesThis study aimed to develop an instrument that integrates all relevant aspects of hope is concise, easy to use and shows good psychometric properties.

designThree pre-existing instruments (Miller Hope Scale, Herth Hope Index, Snyder Hope Scale) covering complementary and overlapping aspects of hope were administered cross-sectionally to a general population sample (n = 489). Factor analysis was used for item reduction. Reliability and validity were tested using factor analysis and item correlations between the new scale and quality of life and depression scales. SETTING AND

participantsThe study was set in Austria. Participants were sampled from the general population using a quota sampling strategy.

resultsThe initial 60 items were reduced to a 23-item scale with four dimensions: 'trust and confidence', 'positive future orientation', 'social relations and personal value' and 'lack of perspective'. The new scale's factor structure was highly stable and its internal consistency high (alpha = 0.92 for the overall scale, 0.80-0.85 for its subscales). Hope scores were negatively correlated with depression (r = -0.68) and positively with quality of life (r = 0.57), with the factor analysis and item discriminant validity supporting the new scale's construct validity.

conclusionsThe new scale comprehensively covers the concept of hope is significantly shorter than previous scales and shows satisfactory reliability and validity.

Indexed as

SpiritualityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21122040
PMCPMC5060596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.