Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21120638›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2011

In vitro and in vivo cardiomyogenic differentiation of amniotic fluid stem cells.

Sveva Bollini, Michela Pozzobon, Muriel Nobles, Johannes Riegler, Xuebin Dong, Martina Piccoli, Angela Chiavegato, Anthony N Price, Marco Ghionzoli, King K Cheung and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Amniotic Fluid Cells, Stem Cells, and p53: Can We Stereotype p53 Functions?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Cardiomyocytes Derived from HumanScientific reports · 2018
    Article
  11. Human Adipose-Derived and Amniotic Fluid-Derived Stem Cells: A Preliminary In Vitro Study Comparing Myogenic Differentiation Capability.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sveva BolliniStem Cell Processing Laboratory-Fondazione Città della Speranza, Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine (VIMM), University of Padua, Via G. Orus, 2, 35129, Padua, Italy. s.bollini@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Michela Pozzobon
Muriel Nobles
Johannes Riegler
Xuebin Dong
Martina Piccoli
Angela Chiavegato
Anthony N Price
Marco Ghionzoli
King K Cheung
Anna Cabrelle
Paul R O'Mahoney
Emanuele Cozzi
Saverio Sartore
Andrew Tinker
Mark F Lythgoe
Paolo De Coppi

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilBritish Heart Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapy has developed as a complementary treatment for myocardial regeneration. While both autologous and allogeneic uses have been advocated, the ideal candidate has not been identified yet. Amniotic fluid-derived stem (AFS) cells are potentially a promising resource for cell therapy and tissue engineering of myocardial injuries. However, no information is available regarding their use in an allogeneic context. c-kit-sorted, GFP-positive rat AFS (GFP-rAFS) cells and neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (rCMs) were characterized by cytocentrifugation and flow cytometry for the expression of mesenchymal, embryonic and cell lineage-specific antigens. The activation of the myocardial gene program in GFP-rAFS cells was induced by co-culture with rCMs. The stem cell differentiation was evaluated using immunofluorescence, RT-PCR and single cell electrophysiology. The in vivo potential of Endorem-labeled GFP-rAFS cells for myocardial repair was studied by transplantation in the heart of animals with ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R), monitored by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Three weeks after injection a small number of GFP-rAFS cells acquired an endothelial or smooth muscle phenotype and to a lesser extent CMs. Despite the low GFP-rAFS cells count in the heart, there was still an improvement of ejection fraction as measured by MRI. rAFS cells have the in vitro propensity to acquire a cardiomyogenic phenotype and to preserve cardiac function, even if their potential may be limited by poor survival in an allogeneic setting.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAmniotic FluidAnimalsAntigens, DifferentiationCell SeparationCell TransdifferentiationCoculture TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFlow CytometryGraft RejectionGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacMyosin Heavy ChainsAntigens, DifferentiationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMyosin Heavy ChainsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTroponin I

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.