ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2011
Personal genetics: regulatory framework in Europe from a service provider's perspective.
Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct to consumer genetic testing-law and policy concerns in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Article
- Legislation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Europe: a fragmented regulatory landscape.Journal of community genetics · 2018Article
- Transparency of genetic testing services for 'health, wellness and lifestyle': analysis of online prepurchase information for UK consumers.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017Article
- Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice.Genes & nutrition · 2017Review
- Neither as harmful as feared by critics nor as empowering as promised by providers: risk information offered direct to consumer by personal genomics companies.Journal of community genetics · 2014Article
- The perspective from EASAC and FEAM on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2013Review
- Some considerations about a report on 'Public health in an era of genomic-based and personalized medicine' from the Public Health Foundation, Cambridge.Journal of community genetics · 2011Article
- Genetic testing in psychiatry: a review of attitudes and beliefs.Psychiatry · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to give an overview and discuss the relevant regulations in place, or under consideration, regarding healthcare-related personal genetics services in Europe - this is a rapidly evolving field and in most European Union (EU) countries the regulatory framework is not yet clear. The review will be framed from the perspective of potential service providers (companies, health services and practitioners, including medical, nutritional, complementary, etc), the growing number of which will need to be aware of potential regulatory hurdles existing now and that may arise in the future. The main conclusion from the survey is that strict regulations regarding practitioner-delivered personal genetic-testing services are unlikely to be enforced over the next 5 years in most EU countries, with the exception of Germany. There is broad-based, but by no means universal, support for a strong voluntary code of practice as an alternative to government regulations to protect consumers and to enable all stakeholders to recognise serious and reputable service providers. On the other hand, there are influential bodies calling for strict regulation. As genotyping costs rapidly fall, it is likely that it will become routine and a major challenge that does not seem to be addressed by current debate on regulations is the emergence of companies offering/selling personal genetic services based on a customer's pre-existing genetic results and therefore no actual laboratory testing involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.