Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21119192›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2010

Issues related to the management and therapy of paediatric pulmonary hypertension.

I Schulze-Neick, M Beghetti

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Meconium aspiration syndrome: a comprehensive review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. The challenges in paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I Schulze-NeickGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children, London, UK. neicki@gosh.nhs.uk
M Beghetti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of medical services dedicated to the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in children are being established. This has, in turn, increased the need to adapt current guidelines for the treatment of PH to be more relevant to paediatric patients with PH. This article will summarise the data obtained so far from paediatric registries, national cohorts and clinical trials and discuss the best approach for developing a treatment algorithm designed for children with different types of PH. The many unanswered questions, challenges and issues relating to the PH in the paediatric population will also be discussed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentAge FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsChildChild, PreschoolHumansHypertension, PulmonaryPractice Guidelines as TopicVasodilator AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID21119192
PMCPMC9487501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.