Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21118979›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

The interaction of human natural killer cells with either unpolarized or polarized macrophages results in different functional outcomes.

Francesca Bellora, Roberta Castriconi, Alessandra Dondero, Giorgio Reggiardo, Lorenzo Moretta, Alberto Mantovani, Alessandro Moretta, Cristina Bottino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca BelloraDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Università degli Studi di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Roberta Castriconi
Alessandra Dondero
Giorgio Reggiardo
Lorenzo Moretta
Alberto Mantovani
Alessandro Moretta
Cristina Bottino
University of Genoa · ITIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cross-talk among cells of the innate immunity can greatly affect both innate and adaptive responses. Here we analyzed the molecular interactions between human natural killer (NK) cells and autologous macrophages. Activated NK cells killed M0 and M2, whereas M1 macrophages were more resistant to lysis because of their higher expression of HLA class I molecules. Following exposure to LPS or bacillus Calmette-Guérin, M0 and M2, but not polarized (endotoxin tolerant) M1 macrophages, induced strong activation of resting NK cells. The expression of CD69 and CD25 activation markers and the acquisition of cytotoxicity against tumor cells and immature dendritic cells required soluble factors being mostly contact independent. On the contrary, IFN-γ production was contact dependent and required the interaction of DNAM-1 and 2B4 (on NK) with their ligands on macrophages as well as IL-18. IL-18 was involved also in the acquisition of CCR7 by NK cells. Interestingly, M0 and M2 cells expressed a membrane-bound form of IL-18, which was released in small amounts after LPS treatment. Our data indicate that, upon interaction with M0 macrophages exposed to microbial products, NK cells may amplify classical type 1 immune responses. In addition, M1-polarizing stimuli can rescue M2 macrophages from their immunomodulatory state and shape their functional behavior toward NK stimulatory capability.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, T-LymphocyteCD69 AntigensCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesCytokinesGenes, MHC Class IHumansInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitK562 CellsKiller Cells, NaturalLectins, C-TypeLipopolysaccharidesLymphocyte ActivationMacrophagesAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, T-LymphocyteCCR7 protein, humanCD69 AntigensCytokinesIL2RA protein, humanInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitLectins, C-TypeLipopolysaccharidesReceptors, CCR7

Identifiers

PMID21118979
PMCPMC3003022
OpenAlexW2014135188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.