ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010
Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786315 (Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions for involving older patients with multi-morbidity in decision-making during primary care consultations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Parent experiences with paediatric allergy pathways in the West Midlands: A qualitative study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019Trial
- A Comparative Analysis of Patient Demographics and Referral Trends Pre- and Post-Intervention of the TIA Pathway: A Retrospective Observational Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Adequacy of electronic and in-person referrals to endocrinology: a prospective study of primary care and hospital consultations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Review Based on Pathophysiological Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Assessing Mental Illness Referral Request Acceptance: A Nationwide E-Referral Data From Saudi Arabia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Variation in general practice referral rate to acute medicine services and association with hospital admission. A retrospective observational study.Family practice · 2023Observational
- Using Australian panel data to account for unobserved factors in measuring inequities for different channels of healthcare utilization.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022Article
- Effects of GP characteristics on unplanned hospital admissions and patient safety. A 9-year follow-up of all Norwegian out-of-hours contacts.Family practice · 2022Article
- Sociodemographic predictors of attendance at a Scottish pain management programme.British journal of pain · 2021Article
- Patterns and trends in eczema management in UK primary care (2009-2018): A population-based cohort study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021Article
- Review
- Randomised feasibility trial and embedded qualitative process evaluation of a new intervention to facilitate the involvement of older patients with multimorbidity in decision-making about their healthcare during general practice consultations: the VOLITION study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2020Article
- Referral decisions and its predictors related to orthopaedic care. A retrospective study in a novel primary care setting.PloS one · 2020Article
- Influences of socioeconomic deprivation on GPs' decisions to refer patients to cardiology: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018Article
- Primary Care Patients' Preference for Hospitals over Clinics in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Recognizing Gynecological Cancer in Primary Care: Risk Factors, Red Flags, and Referrals.Advances in therapy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the extent to which referral for defined symptoms from primary care varies by age, sex, and social deprivation and whether any sociodemographic variations in referral differ according to the presence of national referral guidance and the potential of the symptoms to be life threatening.
designCohort study using individual patient data from the health improvement network database in primary care.
settingUnited Kingdom.
participants5492 patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 23 121 with hip pain, and 101 212 with dyspepsia from 326 general practices, 2001-7.
main outcome measuresMultivariable associations between odds of immediate referral for postmenopausal bleeding and age and social deprivation; hazard rates of referral for hip pain or dyspepsia and age, sex, and social deprivation. Analyses for dyspepsia were stratified for people aged less than and more than 55 years because referral guidance differs by age.
results61.4% (3374/5492) of patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 17.4% (4019/23 121) with hip pain, and 13.8% (13 944/101 212) with dyspepsia were referred. The likelihood of referral for postmenopausal bleeding declined with increasing age: the adjusted odds ratio for patients aged 85 or more compared with those aged 55-64 was 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.49). Patients aged 85 or more with hip pain were also less likely to be referred than those aged 55-64 (0.68, 0.57 to 0.81). Women were less likely than men to be referred for hip pain (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.96). More deprived patients with hip pain or dyspepsia (if aged <55) were less likely to be referred. Adjusted hazard ratios for those in the most deprived Townsend fifth compared with the least deprived were 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.82) and 0.76 (0.68 to 0.85), respectively. No socioeconomic gradient was evident in referral for postmenopausal bleeding.
conclusionsInequalities in referral associated with socioeconomic circumstances were more likely to occur in the absence of both explicit guidance and potentially life threatening conditions, whereas inequalities with age were evident for all conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.