Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21118873›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010

Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study.

Dulcie McBride, Sarah Hardoon, Kate Walters, Stuart Gilmour, Rosalind Raine

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786315 (Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03786315 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ExeterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled72ConditionsDecision Making, Aged, Multimorbidity, General Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Parent experiences with paediatric allergy pathways in the West Midlands: A qualitative study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Using Australian panel data to account for unobserved factors in measuring inequities for different channels of healthcare utilization.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patterns and trends in eczema management in UK primary care (2009-2018): A population-based cohort study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Influences of socioeconomic deprivation on GPs' decisions to refer patients to cardiology: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  19. Primary Care Patients' Preference for Hospitals over Clinics in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dulcie McBrideDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. dulciemcbride@googlemail.com
Sarah Hardoon
Kate Walters
Stuart Gilmour
Rosalind Raine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the extent to which referral for defined symptoms from primary care varies by age, sex, and social deprivation and whether any sociodemographic variations in referral differ according to the presence of national referral guidance and the potential of the symptoms to be life threatening.

designCohort study using individual patient data from the health improvement network database in primary care.

settingUnited Kingdom.

participants5492 patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 23 121 with hip pain, and 101 212 with dyspepsia from 326 general practices, 2001-7.

main outcome measuresMultivariable associations between odds of immediate referral for postmenopausal bleeding and age and social deprivation; hazard rates of referral for hip pain or dyspepsia and age, sex, and social deprivation. Analyses for dyspepsia were stratified for people aged less than and more than 55 years because referral guidance differs by age.

results61.4% (3374/5492) of patients with postmenopausal bleeding, 17.4% (4019/23 121) with hip pain, and 13.8% (13 944/101 212) with dyspepsia were referred. The likelihood of referral for postmenopausal bleeding declined with increasing age: the adjusted odds ratio for patients aged 85 or more compared with those aged 55-64 was 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.49). Patients aged 85 or more with hip pain were also less likely to be referred than those aged 55-64 (0.68, 0.57 to 0.81). Women were less likely than men to be referred for hip pain (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.96). More deprived patients with hip pain or dyspepsia (if aged <55) were less likely to be referred. Adjusted hazard ratios for those in the most deprived Townsend fifth compared with the least deprived were 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.82) and 0.76 (0.68 to 0.85), respectively. No socioeconomic gradient was evident in referral for postmenopausal bleeding.

conclusionsInequalities in referral associated with socioeconomic circumstances were more likely to occur in the absence of both explicit guidance and potentially life threatening conditions, whereas inequalities with age were evident for all conditions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthralgiaDyspepsiaFemaleGeneral PracticeHip JointHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostmenopauseReferral and ConsultationSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID21118873
PMCPMC2995017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.