Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21118703›Full record

ReviewBrain research reviews2011

Automated reconstruction of neuronal morphology: an overview.

Duncan E Donohue, Giorgio A Ascoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. DNeuroMAT: A Deep-Learning-Based Neuron Morphology Analysis Toolbox.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Reconstruction of the Hippocampus.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Digital Reconstruction of the Neuro-Glia-Vascular Architecture.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Duncan E DonohueCenter for Neural Informatics, Structure, & Plasticity and Molecular Neuroscience Department, Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030-4422, USA. dedonohue@gmail.com
Giorgio A Ascoli

Funding

Generation and Description of Neuronal Morphology and ConnectivityR01NS039600 · NINDS · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A · 1999 to 2024
$6.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039600NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS39600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital reconstruction of neuronal morphology is a powerful technique for investigating the nervous system. This process consists of tracing the axonal and dendritic arbors of neurons imaged by optical microscopy into a geometrical format suitable for quantitative analysis and computational modeling. Algorithmic automation of neuronal tracing promises to increase the speed, accuracy, and reproducibility of morphological reconstructions. Together with recent breakthroughs in cellular imaging and accelerating progress in optical microscopy, automated reconstruction of neuronal morphology will play a central role in the development of high throughput screening and the acquisition of connectomic data. Yet, despite continuous advances in image processing algorithms, to date manual tracing remains the overwhelming choice for digitizing neuronal morphology. We summarize the issues involved in automated reconstruction, overview the available techniques, and provide a realistic assessment of future perspectives.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsDendritesHumansImage CytometryNeuronsSoftwareSoftware Validation

Identifiers

PMID21118703
PMCPMC3086984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.