Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21118492›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2010

Comparative genomics reveals birth and death of fragile regions in mammalian evolution.

Max A Alekseyev, Pavel A Pevzner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A high resolution map of mammalian X chromosome fragile regions assessed by large-scale comparative genomics.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anchoring the dog to its relatives reveals new evolutionary breakpoints across 11 species of the Canidae and provides new clues for the role of B chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max A AlekseyevDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of South Carolina, 301 Main St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. maxal@cse.sc.edu
Pavel A Pevzner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important question in genome evolution is whether there exist fragile regions (rearrangement hotspots) where chromosomal rearrangements are happening over and over again. Although nearly all recent studies supported the existence of fragile regions in mammalian genomes, the most comprehensive phylogenomic study of mammals raised some doubts about their existence.

resultsHere we demonstrate that fragile regions are subject to a birth and death process, implying that fragility has a limited evolutionary lifespan.

conclusionsThis finding implies that fragile regions migrate to different locations in different mammals, explaining why there exist only a few chromosomal breakpoints shared between different lineages. The birth and death of fragile regions as a phenomenon reinforces the hypothesis that rearrangements are promoted by matching segmental duplications and suggests putative locations of the currently active fragile regions in the human genome.

Indexed as

Chromosome Fragile SitesEvolution, MolecularAnimalsChromosome BreakpointsGene RearrangementGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansMammalsModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID21118492
PMCPMC3156956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.