ReviewMolecular plant pathology2011
Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen.
Review in Molecular plant pathology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 195 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global perspective on the genetic architecture of susceptibility to spot form net blotch in barley.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Novel resistance loci against Pyrenophora teres f. teres map to chromosomes 3H and 6H of barley.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Bacillus velezensis BE2 controls wheat and barley diseases by direct antagonism and induced systemic resistance.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Early Detection of BothInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- BW312 Hordeum vulgare semi-dwarf mutant exhibits a shifted metabolic profile towards pathogen resistance.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024Article
- What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?Studies in mycology · 2024Article
- High resolution mapping of a novel non-transgressive hybrid susceptibility locus in barley exploited by P. teres f. maculata.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Deep population structure linked to host vernalization requirement in the barley net blotch fungal pathogen.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- Fungicide Sensitivity Profile ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Virulence Spectra of HungarianJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Emergence and spread of the barley net blotch pathogen coincided with crop domestication and cultivation history.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Metabolomic Reconfiguration in Primed Barley (Metabolites · 2023Article
- Widespread genetic heterogeneity and genotypic grouping associated with fungicide resistance among barley spot form net blotch isolates in Australia.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Genetic and physical localization of a major susceptibility gene to Pyrenophora teres f. maculata in barley.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- Article
- Bioactive Metabolite Production in the GenusToxins · 2022Review
- Does Abiotic Host Stress Favour Dothideomycete-Induced Disease Development?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Association mapping reveals a reciprocal virulence/avirulence locus within diverse US Pyrenophora teres f. maculata isolates.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Management ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The barley HvSTP13GR mutant triggers resistance against biotrophic fungi.Molecular plant pathology · 2022Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledPyrenophora teres, causal agent of net blotch of barley, exists in two forms, designated P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata, which induce net form net blotch (NFNB) and spot form net blotch (SFNB), respectively. Significantly more work has been performed on the net form than on the spot form although recent activity in spot form research has increased because of epidemics of SFNB in barley-producing regions. Genetic studies have demonstrated that NFNB resistance in barley is present in both dominant and recessive forms, and that resistance/susceptibility to both forms can be conferred by major genes, although minor quantitative trait loci have also been identified. Early work on the virulence of the pathogen showed toxin effector production to be important in disease induction by both forms of pathogen. Since then, several laboratories have investigated effectors of virulence and avirulence, and both forms are complex in their interaction with the host. Here, we assemble recent information from the literature that describes both forms of this important pathogen and includes reports describing the host-pathogen interaction with barley. We also include preliminary findings from a genome sequence survey. TAXONOMY: Pyrenophora teres Drechs. Kingdom Fungi; Phylum Ascomycota; Subphylum Pezizomycotina; Class Dothideomycete; Order Pleosporales; Family Pleosporaceae; Genus Pyrenophora, form teres and form maculata. IDENTIFICATION: To date, no clear morphological or life cycle differences between the two forms of P. teres have been identified, and therefore they are described collectively. Towards the end of the growing season, the fungus produces dark, globosely shaped pseudothecia, about 1-2mm in diameter, on barley. Ascospores measuring 18-28µm × 43-61µm are light brown and ellipsoidal and often have three to four transverse septa and one or two longitudinal septa in the median cells. Conidiophores usually arise singly or in groups of two or three and are lightly swollen at the base. Conidia measuring 30-174µm × 15-23µm are smoothly cylindrical and straight, round at both ends, subhyaline to yellowish brown, often with four to six pseudosepta. Morphologically, P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata are indistinguishable. HOST RANGE: Comprehensive work on the host range of P. teres f. teres has been performed; however, little information on the host range of P. teres f. maculata is available. Hordeum vulgare and H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum are considered to be the primary hosts for P. teres. However, natural infection by P. teres has been observed in other wild Hordeum species and related species from the genera Bromus, Avena and Triticum, including H. marinum, H. murinum, H. brachyantherum, H. distichon, H. hystrix, B. diandrus, A. fatua, A. sativa and T. aestivum (Shipton et al., 1973, Rev. Plant Pathol. 52:269-290). In artificial inoculation experiments under field conditions, P. teres f. teres has been shown to infect a wide range of gramineous species in the genera Agropyron, Brachypodium, Elymus, Cynodon, Deschampsia, Hordelymus and Stipa (Brown et al., 1993, Plant Dis. 77:942-947). Additionally, 43 gramineous species were used in a growth chamber study and at least one of the P. teres f. teres isolates used was able to infect 28 of the 43 species tested. However, of these 28 species, 14 exhibited weak type 1 or 2 reactions on the NFNB 1-10 scale (Tekauz, 1985). These reaction types are small pin-point lesions and could possibly be interpreted as nonhost reactions. In addition, the P. teres f. teres host range was investigated under field conditions by artificially inoculating 95 gramineous species with naturally infected barley straw. Pyrenophora teres f. teres was re-isolated from 65 of the species when infected leaves of adult plants were incubated on nutrient agar plates; however, other than Hordeum species, only two of the 65 host species exhibited moderately susceptible or susceptible field reaction types, with most species showing small dark necrotic lesions indicative of a highly resistant response to P. teres f. teres. Although these wild species have the potential to be alternative hosts, the high level of resistance identified for most of the species makes their role as a source of primary inoculum questionable. DISEASE SYMPTOMS: Two types of symptom are caused by P. teres. These are net-type lesions caused by P. teres f. teres and spot-type lesions caused by P. teres f. maculata. The net-like symptom, for which the disease was originally named, has characteristic narrow, dark-brown, longitudinal and transverse striations on infected leaves. The spot form symptom consists of dark-brown, circular to elliptical lesions surrounded by a chlorotic or necrotic halo of varying width.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.