ArticleJournal of microscopy2011
A semiautomated approach for artefact removal in serial tissue cryosections.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- From traditional to deep learning approaches in whole slide image registration: A methodological review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- Using digital pathology to standardize and automate histological evaluations of environmental samples.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2025Review
- Automated identification of protein expression intensity and classification of protein cellular locations in mouse brain regions from immunofluorescence images.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-GE) image analysis based on CellProfiler: Pseudomonas aeruginosa AG1 as model.Medicine · 2020Article
- Geometry processing of conventionally produced mouse brain slice images.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2018Article
- A chicken embryo cardiac outflow tract atlas for registering changes due to abnormal blood flow.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2016Article
- A Gauss-Seidel iteration scheme for reference-free 3-D histological image reconstruction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2015Article
- Lossless 3-D reconstruction and registration of semi-quantitative gene expression data in the mouse brain.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2011Article
- Multimodal laminar characterization of visual areas along the cortical hierarchy.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thinly sliced serial tissue sections of an organ can be imaged using optical microscopy at a resolution detailing individual cells. When the tissue sections are first subjected to in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry, these data sets can be analysed for changes in gene expression and gene products. Such spatial information is important for understanding the functional effects of experimental or environmental challenges to the organism. However, a critical step in analysing these data sets is mitigating artefacts that result from the preparation of the tissue sections. In this paper, we describe an automated method with manual validation tools that together enable detecting and addressing artefacts including dust particles and air bubbles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.