Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21116662›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2011

Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study.

Axel Schäfer, Toby Hall, Gerd Müller, Kathryn Briffa

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01483573 naterminatednot on this map

Effect of Hamstring Stretching and Neural Mobilization on Range of Motion and Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyRan2010 to 2015Enrolled25ConditionsLow Back PainArmsneural mobilization, straight leg raise
NCT02941133 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization Techniques Compared to Standard Care Treatment in Patients With Lumbar Radiculitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMichalis EfstathiouRan2017 to 2020Enrolled130ConditionsRadiculitisArmsNeural Mobilization, Standard Care
NCT03368638 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Neural And Hip Mobilizations In Patients With Neurogenic Claudication Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Case Series

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterRan2018 to 2019Enrolled8ConditionsLumbar Spinal StenosisArmsPhysical therapy intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Axel SchäferFaculty of Social Work and Health, Degree Programmes for Occupational Therapy, Speech and Language Therapy & Physiotherapy, HAWK University of Applied Science and Arts, Goschentor 1, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany. meender@web.de
Toby Hall
Gerd Müller
Kathryn Briffa
Curtin University · AURückenzentrum am Michel · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective is to determine if pain and disability outcomes of patients treated with neural mobilisation differ for sub-classifications of low back and leg pain (LB&LP). Radiating leg pain is a poor prognostic factor for recovery in patients with LBP. To improve outcome, a new pathomechanism-based classification system was proposed: neuropathic sensitization (NS), denervation (D), peripheral nerve sensitization (PNS) and musculoskeletal (M). Seventy-seven patients with unilateral LB&LP were recruited. Following classification, all subjects were treated seven times with neural mobilisation techniques. A successful outcome was defined as achieving a minimal clinically important change in pain intensity (11-point numerical rating scale), physical function (Roland Morris disability questionnaire) and global perceived change (7-point Likert scale: from 1 = "completely recovered" to 7 = "worse than ever"). The proportion of responders was significantly greater in PNS (55.6%) than the other three groups (NS 10%; D 14.3% and M10%). After adjusting for baseline differences, mean magnitude of improvement of the outcome measures were significantly greater in PNS compared to the other groups. Patients classified as PNS have a more favourable prognosis following neural mobilisation compared to the other groups.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleManipulation, SpinalMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesSciaticaTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21116662
PMCPMC3048230
OpenAlexW2056688872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.