Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21116637›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2011

Impact of smoking on the outcome of patients treated with drug-eluting stents: 1-year results from the prospective multicentre German Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE).

Mohammad A Sherif, Christoph A Nienaber, Ralph Toelg, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Volker Geist, Steffen Schneider, Jochen Senges, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Ulrich Tebbe, Gert Richardt

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The impact of cigarette smoking in predicting stroke using CHADSNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction between smokers and nonsmokers.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2014
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention receiving drug eluting stents.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Smoking restrictions and hospitalization for acute coronary events in Germany.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad A SherifHerz-Kreislauf-Zentrum, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Bad Segeberg, Germany. mohammad_sherif@hotmail.com
Christoph A Nienaber
Ralph Toelg
Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Volker Geist
Steffen Schneider
Jochen Senges
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Ulrich Tebbe
Gert Richardt
Segeberger Kliniken · DEStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung · DEAsklepios Kliniken Hamburg · DEKlinikum Lippe · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCigarette smoking strongly increases morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes, but the relevance of smoking in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) is unknown.

aimsTo assess the impact of smoking on the presentation and outcome of patients treated with DES. METHODS AND

resultsWe analyzed data from the prospective multicentre German Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE) and identified 1,122 patients who had never smoked and 1,052 patients who were current smokers. Smokers were younger (56.5 vs. 69.4 years, p < 0.0001), more often males, with less frequent diabetes and hypertension compared to non-smokers. Smokers presented more often with acute coronary syndromes. After a mean follow-up of 12.5 months, smokers had both higher mortality (4.6 vs. 2.7%, p < 0.05) and myocardial infarction (MI) rates (4.9 vs. 3%, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers in the rate of target vessel revascularization (9.8 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.26). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (defined as the composite of death, MI and stroke, MACCE) were higher in smokers (10.6 vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). Moreover, after adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic variables, smoking continued to be a strong independent predictor for MACCE (OR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.49-3.68). In a subgroup analysis, we found that the increased risk of smoking was most prominent in patients presenting with stable angina pectoris (OR = 3.71, 95% CI 1.24-2.57, p < 0.05). Smoking almost doubled the risk for MACCE in acute MI patients, though this did not reach statistical significance (adjusted OR = 1.91, 95% CI 0.93-3.94, p = 0.74).

conclusionThis large multicentre DES registry provides evidence that smokers treated with DES, despite lower incidence of predisposing risk factors for atherosclerosis, experience higher rates of death and MI compared to non-smokers, particularly in the setting of stable coronary artery disease. Smoking has only marginal effects on target vessel revascularization rates in patients treated with DES.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryChi-Square DistributionCoronary Artery DiseaseDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGermanyHospital MortalityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID21116637
OpenAlexW2015290060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.