Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21116335›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2010

Silodosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Maxime Rossi, Thierry Roumeguère

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular mechanism of human αCommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 2-Phenethylamines in Medicinal Chemistry: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maxime RossiDepartment of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.
Thierry Roumeguère
Erasmus Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are highly prevalent in older men. Medical therapy is the first-line treatment for LUTS due to BPH. Alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers remain one of the mainstays in the treatment of male LUTS and clinical BPH. They exhibit early onset of efficacy with regard to both symptoms and flow rate improvement, and this is clearly demonstrated in placebo-controlled trials with extensions out to five years. These agents have been shown to prevent symptomatic progression of the disease. The aim of this article is to offer a critical review of the current literature on silodosin, formerly known as KMD-3213, a novel alpha-blocker with unprecedented selectivity for α(1A)-adrenergic receptors, as compared with both α(1B)- and α(1D) -adrenoceptors, exceeding the selectivity of all currently used α(1)-blockers, and with clinically promising effects.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsDisease ProgressionHumansIndolesMaleProstatic HyperplasiaProstatismReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1Urination DisordersADRA1A protein, humanAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsIndolesReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1silodosinbenign prostatic hyperplasialower urinary tract symptomssilodosinuroselectivityα1A- blockers

Identifiers

PMID21116335
PMCPMC2990389
OpenAlexW2073495245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.