Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21116188›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association

Early enteral nutrition in burns: compliance with guidelines and associated outcomes in a multicenter study.

Michael J Mosier, Tam N Pham, Matthew B Klein, Nicole S Gibran, Brett D Arnoldo, Richard L Gamelli, Ronald G Tompkins, David N Herndon

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Early enteral nutrition in critically-ill patients.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Burns: Classification, Pathophysiology, and Treatment: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. An investigation of early enteral nutrition provision in major burn patients in Australia and New Zealand.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Research advances on early enteral nutritional therapy in severe burn patients].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Burn wound healing and treatment: review and advancements.Critical care (London, England) · 2015
    Review
  20. Early Enteral Nutrition for Burn Injury.Advances in wound care · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J MosierDepartment of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA.
Tam N Pham
Matthew B Klein
Nicole S Gibran
Brett D Arnoldo
Richard L Gamelli
Ronald G Tompkins
David N Herndon
University of Washington · USHarborview Medical Center · USLoyola University Chicago · USLoyola University Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USParkland Health & Hospital System · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Inflammation and the Response to InjuryU54GM062119 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHOENFELD, DAVID ALAN · 2001 to 2010
$78.6M
Institute for Translational Health Science (KL2)KL2RR025015 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$9.3M
NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2RR025015-01NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025015NIGMS NIH HHS 2-U54-GM062119NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM062119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early nutritional support is an essential component of burn care to prevent ileus, stress ulceration, and the effects of hypermetabolism. The American Burn Association practice guidelines state that enteral feedings should be initiated as soon as practical. The authors sought to evaluate compliance with early enteral nutrition (EN) guidelines, associated complications, and hospitalization outcomes in a prospective multicenter observational study. They conducted a retrospective review of mechanically ventilated burn patients enrolled in the prospective observational multicenter study "Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury." Timing of initiation of tube feedings was recorded, with early EN defined as being started within 24 hours of admission. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to distinguish barriers to initiation of EN and the impact of early feeding on development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, infectious complications, days on mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and survival. A total of 153 patients met study inclusion criteria. The cohort comprised 73% men, with a mean age of 41 ± 15 years and a mean %TBSA burn of 46 ± 18%. One hundred twenty-three patients (80%) began EN in the first 24 hours and 145 (95%) by 48 hours. Age, sex, inhalation injury, and full-thickness burn size were similar between those fed by 24 hours vs after 24 hours, except for higher mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (26 vs 23, P = .03) and smaller total burn size (44 vs 54% TBSA burn, P = .01) in those fed early. There was no significant difference in rates of hyperglycemia, abdominal compartment syndrome, or gastrointestinal bleeding between groups. Patients fed early had shorter ICU length of stay (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, P = 0.03, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.94) and reduced wound infection risk (adjusted odds ratio 0.28, P = 0.01, 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.76). The investigators have found early EN to be safe, with no increase in complications and a lower rate of wound infections and shorter ICU length of stay. Across institutions, there has been high compliance with early EN as part of the standard operating procedure in this prospective multicenter observational trial. The investigators advocate that initiation of EN by 24 hours be used as a formal recommendation in nutrition guidelines for severe burns, and that nutrition guidelines be actively disseminated to individual burn centers to permit a change in practice.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicAdultAPACHEBurnsChi-Square DistributionEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansInfectionsLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMultiple Organ FailureProspective StudiesRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID21116188
PMCPMC3850279
OpenAlexW1968068128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.