Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21115800›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial enteropathogens isolated from international travelers to Mexico, Guatemala, and India from 2006 to 2008.

Jeannette Ouyang-Latimer, Syed Jafri, Audrey VanTassel, Zhi-Dong Jiang, Kaur Gurleen, Savio Rodriguez, Ranjan K Nandy, Thandavaryan Ramamurthy, Santanu Chatterjee, Robin McKenzie and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Toward aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Travel-Related Antimicrobial Resistance: A Systematic Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Review
  14. Multidrug-Resistant Lineage of EnterotoxigenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cross-ProtectiveFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeannette Ouyang-LatimerBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Syed Jafri
Audrey VanTassel
Zhi-Dong Jiang
Kaur Gurleen
Savio Rodriguez
Ranjan K Nandy
Thandavaryan Ramamurthy
Santanu Chatterjee
Robin McKenzie
Robert Steffen
Herbert L DuPont
Goa Medical College · INThe University of Texas at Austin · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USBaylor College of Medicine · USInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CHJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence rates of travelers' diarrhea (TD) have remained high for the last 50 years. More recently, there have been increasing recommendations for self-initiated therapy and use of prophylactic drugs for TD. We last examined the in vitro susceptibilities of commonly used antibiotics against TD pathogens in 1997. We now examine 456 enteropathogens isolated from adult travelers to Mexico, India, and Guatemala with diarrhea acquired between 2006 and 2008 to determine changes in susceptibility against 10 different antimicrobials by the agar dilution method. Traditional antibiotics, such as ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and doxycycline, continue to show high levels of resistance. Current first-line antibiotic agents, including fluoroquinolones and azithromycin, showed significantly higher MICs than in our earlier study, and MIC(90) levels were above the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute cutoffs for resistance. There were significant geographical differences in resistance patterns when Central America was compared with India. Entertoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates showed increased resistance to ciprofloxacin (P = 0.023) and levofloxacin (P = 0.0078) in India compared with Central America. Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) isolates from Central America showed increased resistance to nearly all of the antibiotics tested. Compared to MICs of isolates 10 years prior, there were 4- to 10-fold increases in MIC(90) values for ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and azithromycin for both ETEC and EAEC. There were no significant changes in rifaximin MICs. Rising MICs over time imply the need for continuous surveillance of susceptibility patterns worldwide and geographically specific recommendations in TD therapy.

Indexed as

TravelAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinCiprofloxacinDiarrheaDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coliGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGuatemalaHumansIndiaMexicoAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinCiprofloxacinRifamycinsRifaximin

Identifiers

PMID21115800
PMCPMC3028774
OpenAlexW2131486886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.