Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21115625›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2011

Cystatin C reduction ratio depends on normalized blood liters processed and fluid removal during hemodialysis.

Shih-Han S Huang, Guido Filler, Abeer Yasin, Robert M Lindsay

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Trace elements in dialysis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Review
  4. Removal and rebound kinetics of cystatin C in high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2014
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Methods of assessing renal function.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Review
  7. Cystatin C in children on chronic hemodialysis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013
    Article
  8. Residual renal function calculated from serum cystatin C measurements and knowledge of the weekly standard Kt/V urea.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shih-Han S HuangDepartment of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, and Room A2-345, Victoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4G5.
Guido Filler
Abeer Yasin
Robert M Lindsay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesA negative correlation between the weekly standard Kt/V (urea) and serum cystatin C level (CysC) in functionally anephric dialysis patients has been previously demonstrated. Our objective was to measure the per dialysis CysC reduction ratio (CCRR) and to compare it with other indices of dialytic functions. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a pilot cross-sectional study of 15 functionally anephric patients on conventional high-flux high-efficiency hemodialysis three times per week, CysC levels were drawn pre-, mid-, and postdialysis over 1 week. CCRR was compared with single-pool Kt/V (Sp Kt/V) using urea kinetic modeling, urea reduction ratio (URR), creatinine reduction ratio (CRR), normalized liters processed (LP/kg), and ultrafiltration volume (UF). Normally distributed data (Shapiro-Wilks test) were described as mean±SD, otherwise as median and interquartile range.

resultsThe mean pre- and post-CysC levels were 6.0±1.0 and 4.7±1.1 mg/L. The Sp Kt/V and Std Kt/V were 1.5±0.2 and 2.6. The URR, CRR, and CCRR were 70.2%±9.0%, 64.5%±8.2%, and 26.1%±11.8%, respectively. There was no correlation between the CCRR, and the Sp Kt/V, URR, and CRR, whereas CCRR correlated with LP/kg and UF. Multiple regression analysis with these two parameters provided a model that explained 81% of the variance.

conclusionsOur data suggest that normalized liters processed and ultrafiltration volume explain most of the variance of CCRR. Therefore, CCRR may be an excellent method to monitor dialysis efficiency of low molecular weight proteins.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAgedBiomarkersCreatinineCross-Sectional StudiesCystatin CHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKineticsMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalOntarioPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsRegression AnalysisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersCreatinineCST3 protein, humanCystatin CUrea

Identifiers

PMID21115625
PMCPMC3052222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.