Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21115622›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2011

Implications of the CKD-EPI GFR estimation equation in clinical practice.

Jesse D Schold, Sankar D Navaneethan, Stacey E Jolly, Emilio D Poggio, Susana Arrigain, Welf Saupe, Anil Jain, John W Sharp, James F Simon, Martin J Schreiber and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using race in the estimation of glomerular filtration rates: time for a reversal?Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2020
    Review
  7. Impact of a single eGFR and eGFR-estimating equation on chronic kidney disease reclassification: a cohort study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Increased risk of cardiovascular events in end-stage renal disease patients with osteoporosis: a nationwide population-based cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jesse D ScholdQuantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Sankar D Navaneethan
Stacey E Jolly
Emilio D Poggio
Susana Arrigain
Welf Saupe
Anil Jain
John W Sharp
James F Simon
Martin J Schreiber
Joseph V Nally

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant public health problem whose diagnosis and staging relies upon GFR-estimating equations, including the new CKD-EPI equation. CKD-EPI demonstrated superior performance compared with the existing MDRD equation but has not been applied to a healthcare system. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We identified 53,759 patients with stages 3 to 5 CKD on the basis of either MDRD or CKD-EPI equations using two eGFR values <60 ml/min per 1.73 m² > 90 days apart from an outpatient setting. We compared patient characteristics, presence of related diagnosis codes, and time CKD classification between equations.

resultsThe number of patients identified with CKD decreased 10% applying CKD-EPI versus MDRD. Changes varied substantially by patient characteristics including a 35% decrease among patients < 60 years and a 10% increase among patients > 90 years. Women, non-African Americans, nondiabetics, and obese patients were less likely to be classified on the basis of CKD-EPI. Time to CKD classification was significantly longer with CKD-EPI among younger patients. 14% of patients identified with CKD on the basis of either estimating equation also had a related ICD-9 diagnosis, ranging from 19% among patients < 60 years to 7% among patients > 90 years.

conclusionsConsistent with findings in the general population, CKD-EPI resulted in substantial declines in equation-based CKD diagnoses in a large healthcare system. Further research is needed to determine whether widespread use of CKD-EPI with current guidelines could lead to delayed needed care among younger patients or excessive referrals among older patients.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateModels, BiologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID21115622
PMCPMC3082406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.