Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21114948›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2010

Patient preferences for obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment.

Sapana R Patel, Helen Blair Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Acceptability of Treatments and Services for Individuals with Hoarding Behaviors.Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sapana R PatelColumbia University, Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA. sp2309@columbia.edu
Helen Blair Simpson
New York State Psychiatric Institute

Funding

Maximizing Treatment Outcome in OCDR01MH045436 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SIMPSON, HELEN BLAIR · 1990 to 2015
$5.0M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Imaging the Serotonin System in Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderR01MH073915 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SIMPSON, HELEN BLAIR · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
Building Translational Research in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (R24)R24MH080022 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SIMPSON, HELEN BLAIR · 2008 to 2010
$956k
Patient-Centered Care for Underserved Minorities in Primary CareK23MH082118 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI PATEL, SAPANA R. · 2008 to 2012
$924k
Enhancing Patient-Oriented Research and Training in OCDK24MH091555 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SIMPSON, HELEN BLAIR · 2010 to 2014
$742k
Enhancing CBT Adherence in Refractory Obsessive Compulsive Disorder with MIR34MH071570 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SIMPSON, HELEN BLAIR · 2006 to 2008
$625k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH082118NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH 082118-01A1NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH091555NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH045436NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073915NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH080022NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH071570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore preferences for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We hypothesized that OCD patients will select a combination of medication and psychotherapy as their most preferred choice overall.

methodThe authors designed a treatment-preference survey using 2 health economics methods, forced-choice and contingent-ranking methods, to elicit preferences for OCD treatment available in mainstream care (serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SRIs], exposure and response prevention [EX/RP], and their combination) and for novel treatments under development at OCD research clinics. This survey was given by telephone to 89 individuals with OCD who called the OCD research clinic at the New York State Psychiatric Institute between July 2008 and January 2009. Diagnosis of OCD was based on a telephone screening evaluation adapted from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders.

resultsMost participants chose combination treatment (43%) or EX/RP (42%) over SRI medication (16%). Participants ranked investigational psychotherapy as their most-preferred novel treatment (endorsed by 48% of participants) and deep brain stimulation as their least-preferred novel treatment (endorsed by 77% of participants). Qualitative data suggest that prior treatment experience, concerns about medications, and logistical and practical concerns about treatment regimens affect preferences.

conclusionsPatients with OCD have identifiable treatment preferences. In this sample of convenience, most preferred either combination treatment or psychotherapy. Future studies should investigate prospectively what modifies these preferences and how these preferences affect treatment outcome.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAttitude to HealthCombined Modality TherapyData CollectionDeep Brain StimulationFemaleHumansMaleObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPsychotherapySelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21114948
PMCPMC3109740
OpenAlexW2046554672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.