Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21114840›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Systematic integration of experimental data and models in systems biology.

Peter Li, Joseph O Dada, Daniel Jameson, Irena Spasic, Neil Swainston, Kathleen Carroll, Warwick Dunn, Farid Khan, Naglis Malys, Hanan L Messiha and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. libChEBI: an API for accessing the ChEBI database.Journal of cheminformatics · 2016
    Article
  7. How to make Mathematics Biology's next and better microscope.Biomolecular detection and quantification · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An analysis of a 'community-driven' reconstruction of the human metabolic network.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enzyme informatics.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Peter LiSchool of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. peter.li@manchester.ac.uk
Joseph O Dada
Daniel Jameson
Irena Spasic
Neil Swainston
Kathleen Carroll
Warwick Dunn
Farid Khan
Naglis Malys
Hanan L Messiha
Evangelos Simeonidis
Dieter Weichart
Catherine Winder
Jill Wishart
David S Broomhead
Carole A Goble
Simon J Gaskell
Douglas B Kell
Hans V Westerhoff
Pedro Mendes
Norman W Paton

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C003608/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C008219/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F003501/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F018398/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe behaviour of biological systems can be deduced from their mathematical models. However, multiple sources of data in diverse forms are required in the construction of a model in order to define its components and their biochemical reactions, and corresponding parameters. Automating the assembly and use of systems biology models is dependent upon data integration processes involving the interoperation of data and analytical resources.

resultsTaverna workflows have been developed for the automated assembly of quantitative parameterised metabolic networks in the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML). A SBML model is built in a systematic fashion by the workflows which starts with the construction of a qualitative network using data from a MIRIAM-compliant genome-scale model of yeast metabolism. This is followed by parameterisation of the SBML model with experimental data from two repositories, the SABIO-RK enzyme kinetics database and a database of quantitative experimental results. The models are then calibrated and simulated in workflows that call out to COPASIWS, the web service interface to the COPASI software application for analysing biochemical networks. These systems biology workflows were evaluated for their ability to construct a parameterised model of yeast glycolysis.

conclusionsDistributed information about metabolic reactions that have been described to MIRIAM standards enables the automated assembly of quantitative systems biology models of metabolic networks based on user-defined criteria. Such data integration processes can be implemented as Taverna workflows to provide a rapid overview of the components and their relationships within a biochemical system.

Indexed as

Metabolic Networks and PathwaysDatabases, FactualModels, BiologicalSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID21114840
PMCPMC3008707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.