Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21114327›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2010

Molecular basis for the differences in lipid and lipoprotein binding properties of human apolipoproteins E3 and E4.

David Nguyen, Padmaja Dhanasekaran, Margaret Nickel, Ryosuke Nakatani, Hiroyuki Saito, Michael C Phillips, Sissel Lund-Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multifaceted roles of APOE in Alzheimer disease.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Apolipoprotein E in lipid metabolism and neurodegenerative disease.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David NguyenLipid Research Group, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4318, United States.
Padmaja Dhanasekaran
Margaret Nickel
Ryosuke Nakatani
Hiroyuki Saito
Michael C Phillips
Sissel Lund-Katz
University of Pennsylvania · USTokushima University · JPPhiladelphia University · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL BASIS OF THE INTERACTIONS OF APOLIPOPROTEIN ER01HL056083 · NHLBI · MCP HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY · PI LUND-KATZ, SISSEL · 1997 to 2013
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL56083NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL056083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human apolipoprotein (apo) E4 binds preferentially to very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs), whereas apoE3 binds preferentially to high-density lipoproteins (HDLs), resulting in different plasma cholesterol levels for the two isoforms. To understand the molecular basis for this effect, we engineered the isolated apoE N-terminal domain (residues 1-191) and C-terminal domain (residues 192-299) together with a series of variants containing deletions in the C-terminal domain and assessed their lipid and lipoprotein binding properties. Both isoforms can bind to a phospholipid (PL)-stabilized triolein emulsion, and residues 261-299 are primarily responsible for this activity. ApoE4 exhibits better lipid binding ability than apoE3 as a consequence of a rearrangement involving the segment spanning residues 261-272 in the C-terminal domain. The strong lipid binding ability of apoE4 coupled with the VLDL particle surface being ∼60% PL-covered is the basis for its preference for binding VLDL rather than HDL. ApoE4 binds much more strongly than apoE3 to VLDL but less strongly than apoE3 to HDL(3), consistent with apoE-lipid interactions being relatively unimportant for binding to HDL. The preference of apoE3 for binding to HDL(3) arises because binding is mediated primarily by interaction of the N-terminal helix bundle domain with the resident apolipoproteins that cover ∼80% of the HDL(3) particle surface. Thus, the selectivity in the binding of apoE3 and apoE4 to HDL(3) and VLDL is dependent upon two factors: (1) the stronger lipid binding ability of apoE4 relative to that of apoE3 and (2) the differences in the nature of the surfaces of VLDL and HDL(3) particles, with the former being largely covered with PL and the latter with protein.

Indexed as

Lipid MetabolismApolipoprotein E3Apolipoprotein E4Escherichia coliGene ExpressionHumansLipoproteinsLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, VLDLMutationProtein BindingProtein IsoformsProtein Structure, TertiaryApolipoprotein E3Apolipoprotein E4LipoproteinsLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, VLDLProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID21114327
PMCPMC3025481
OpenAlexW2325931377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.