Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21113663›Full record

ArticleBiomedical microdevices2011

Hot embossing for fabrication of a microfluidic 3D cell culture platform.

Jessie S Jeon, Seok Chung, Roger D Kamm, Joseph L Charest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical microdevices, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Copying a soft lithography master mold using an inexpensive, hobby-use UV-curable resin.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Microfluidic Organ-on-A-chip: A Guide to Biomaterial Choice and Fabrication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessie S JeonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Seok Chung
Roger D Kamm
Joseph L Charest

Funding

Microfluidic 3D Scaffold Assay for Cancer Cell Migration and IntravasationR21CA140096 · NCI · CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY · PI CHAREST, JOSEPH L. · 2009 to 2011
$672k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA140096NCI NIH HHS R21CA140096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinically relevant studies of cell function in vitro require a physiologically-representative microenvironment possessing aspects such as a 3D extracellular matrix (ECM) and controlled biochemical and biophysical parameters. A polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic system with a 3D collagen gel has previously served for analysis of factors inducing different responses of cells in a 3D microenvironment under controlled biochemical and biophysical parameters. In the present study, applying the known commercially-viable manufacturing methods to a cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) material resulted in a microfluidic device with enhanced 3D gel capabilities, controlled surface properties, and improved potential to serve high-volume applications. Hot embossing and roller lamination molded and sealed the microfluidic device. A combination of oxygen plasma and thermal treatments enhanced the sealing, ensured proper placement of the 3D gel, and created controlled and stable surface properties within the device. Culture of cells in the new device indicated no adverse effects of the COC material or processing as compared to previous PDMS devices. The results demonstrate a methodology to transition microfluidic devices for 3D cell culture from scientific research to high-volume applications with broad clinical impact.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureCell Culture TechniquesCell SurvivalCycloparaffinsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrotechnologyPolymersReproducibility of ResultsCycloparaffinsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID21113663
PMCPMC3117225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.