ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2010
[Systemic therapy of renal cell carcinoma].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has completely changed in the last 5 years. Although a cure for the disease is still not achieved with systemic treatment in the majority of cases immunotherapy is no longer used. The therapeutic regiments are mainly based on angiogenic inhibitors such as sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, everolimus and temsirolimus as well as the combination of bevacizumab with interferon. This article gives an overview of these treatment options and the clinical setting for their usage. To achieve a prolonged progression-free survival, a continuous therapy based on the new drugs is necessary. The major goal of the treatment remains to keep the disease stable as complete remission is only seen in 2-4% of cases. With these lengthy treatment regimes a schedule for sequenced administration of drugs is necessary for most of the patients. The optimal treatment sequence is unknown and should be chosen based on the individual course of the disease and the side effects as well as comorbidities. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.