Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21113572›Full record

ArticleDer Radiologe2011

[MRI for therapy control in patients with aortic isthmus stenosis].

B J Wintersperger, D Theisen, M F Reiser

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Radiologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

B J WinterspergerKlinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Campus Großhadern, München, Deutschland. Bernd.Wintersperger@uhn.on.ca
D Theisen
M F Reiser
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEToronto General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic isthmus stenosis is the most common congenital aortic anomaly and is often a problem for therapy surveillance. In addition to possible comorbidities (e.g. bicuspid aortic valve) it is accompanied by various middle and long-term complications depending on the primary choice of the therapeutic procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role for the mostly young patients in the control of the aortic isthmus stenosis and therapy because it is non-invasive and there is no X-ray exposure. Radiologists should be well-informed on the principles of the therapeutic procedure in order to be competent in the interpretation of MRI findings. Due to the continuous development of MRI technology, techniques for functional evaluation (e.g. dynamic MRA, 4D PC flow measurement) are increasingly becoming available in addition to high-resolution MR angiography (MRA), which could predict the risk of possible complications, such as aneurysms. However, in this aspect further studies are necessary. Interventional therapy with stents and stent grafts is often employed for the therapy of possible complications following an operation (aneurysms, restenosis) but because of massive metal artefacts the use of MRI is often sometimes severely limited.

Indexed as

Aortic CoarctationAortic Valve StenosisHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPrognosisSurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21113572
OpenAlexW1578191591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.