Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21113420›Full record

ArticleMolecular simulation2007

Molecular dynamics simulations of three protegrin-type antimicrobial peptides: interplay between charges at the termini, β-sheet structure and amphiphilic interactions.

D S Bolintineanu, A A Langham, H T Davis, Y N Kaznessis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular simulation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. On the nature of antimicrobial activity: a model for protegrin-1 pores.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D S BolintineanuDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
A A Langham
H T Davis
Y N Kaznessis
University of Minnesota · USTwin Cities Orthopedics · US

Funding

Computational Modeling /Design of Antimicrobial PeptidesR01GM070989 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KAZNESSIS, YIANNIS · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have carried out molecular dynamics simulations of the naturally occurring protegrin PG-1 peptide and two of its mutants, PC-9 and PC-13 in the presence of a dodecyl-phosphocholine (DPC) micelle. The effects of mutations that disrupt the β-sheet structure in the case of PC-9 and reduce the charge at the C-terminus in the case of PC-13 are analyzed. It is found that the surface-bound conformations of the peptides are severely affected by both mutations. PG-1 exhibits a conformation in which the C-terminus and the β-hairpin turn interact strongly with the micelle lipid head groups, while its N-terminal strand bends away from the micelle and resides in the aqueous region; PC-13 exhibits strong interactions with the micelle at its N-terminus as well as the β-hairpin turn region, while retaining a much more compact conformation than PG-1; PC-9 achieves a highly distorted conformation relative to the homologous PG-1 structure, which allows both its termini and the β-hairpin region to interact with the micelle. These significant differences observed as a result of seemingly minor mutations to the sequences of the three peptides are explained in terms of the interplay between residue charges, structural rigidity and amphiphilic interactions. Conservative inferences are made bridging these biophysical interactions and the pharmacological profiles of the peptides.

Identifiers

PMID21113420
PMCPMC2990530
OpenAlexW2130740834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.